Star Trek: The Next Generation: Masks
by John Vornholt
Published: 1989 Previously read: ??? (mid-1990s) Acquired: October 2013 Reread: June 2023 |
Steve[n] Mollmann's blog: it only knows that it needs, but like so many of us, it does not know what
Star Trek: The Next Generation: Masks
by John Vornholt
Published: 1989 Previously read: ??? (mid-1990s) Acquired: October 2013 Reread: June 2023 |
Here's the second in my series of posts looking at how my reading habits have changed over time. This one covers science fiction and fantasy that is neither tie-ins nor comic books. In the Excel sheet I'm basing these posts on, I break out authors; some authors of course write both sf&f and non-genre literature. For the purposes of these posts, I'm placing authors in the category where the majority of their work that I've read falls. For example, M. T. Anderson and H. G. Wells write sf&f and literature and even nonfiction, but most of their work that I've read is sf&f, so I'm including them in this post.
2003-07 | 2007-11 | 2011-15 | 2015-19 | 2019-23 | TOTAL | PCT | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
L. F. Baum / Oz | 0 | 7 | 1 | 13 | 41 | 62 | 2.1% |
H. G. Wells | 0 | 7 | 10 | 15 | 3 | 35 | 1.2% |
U. K. Le Guin | 7 | 0 | 8 | 5 | 4 | 24 | 0.8% |
The Expanse | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 10 | 18 | 0.6% |
L. Snicket / D. Handler | 13 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 0.5% |
T. Pratchett | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 14 | 0.5% |
I. Asimov / Foundation | 2 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 0.5% |
M. T. Anderson | 2 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 14 | 0.5% |
J. R. R. Tolkien | 0 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 0.4% |
S. Lem | 6 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 11 | 0.4% |
Pern | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 11 | 0.4% |
Lensmen | 6 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0.3% |
O. Butler | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 10 | 0.3% |
His Dark Materials | 0 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 0.3% |
T. Pierce | 0 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0.3% |
D. Duane | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0.3% |
D. Lessing | 1 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0.2% |
N. Okorafor | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 0.2% |
D. Gerrold | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0.2% |
A. Leckie | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 0.2% |
G. Griffith | 0 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0.2% |
Hyperion Cantos | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 0.2% |
P. K. Dick | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 0.2% |
The Dark Is Rising | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0.2% |
Y. H. Lee | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 0.2% |
N. Novik | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 0.2% |
I. Calvino | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0.2% |
L. M. Bujold | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 0.2% |
B. Chambers | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 0.1% |
B. Sanderson | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.1% |
M. Padmanabhan | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0.1% |
K. S. Robinson | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0.1% |
C. Miéville | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 0.1% |
Harry Potter | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0.1% |
O. S. Card | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0.1% |
R. Shearman | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0.1% |
V. Singh | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0.1% |
S. Pinsker | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0.1% |
Other SF&F | 14 | 70 | 62 | 76 | 95 | 317 | 10.8% |
TOTAL | 86 | 141 | 110 | 154 | 207 | 698 | 23.8% |
PCT | 15.6% | 23.2% | 16.3% | 25.0% | 42.8% | 23.8% |
2016 was the first year I read for the Hugo Awards, and you can see that that's clearly when sf&f becomes a bigger part of my reading diet. I was a bit surprised to see general sf&f also fares well in 2007-11, but now that I think about it, that makes sense—I bought a lot of stuff from used bookstores around the time I graduated college, and would have read much of it over the subsequent years. But these days it's over 40% of my reading, both Hugo books and books I've read because of them.
On the other hand, what's a bit surprising to me is to see how there are some authors I think of as favorites, and whom I am actively reading my way through... and yet I haven't read anything by them for some time! For example: Lem, Calvino, Shearman. I need to prioritize them more... but I suppose by the very nature of the idea, you can't prioritize everything!
I was not very surprised to see that Le Guin and Wells (other than Baum) topped my list. Thank grad school for Wells, and I've been fairly steady with my Le Guin.
Some other thoughts on specific authors:
Overall, I'm pretty happy that I read more sf&f, and especially more contemporary sf&f, than I used to... but I wish I read some of my supposedly favorite authors more often! We'll see if that's rectified in the coming years as I continue to tackle my reading list.
Black Panther Epic Collection: Panther's Prey
Collection published: 2021 Contents originally published: 1989-94 Read: August 2023 |
After Don McGregor's Black Panther run from Jungle Action was cancelled back in 1976, he actually got invited back two more times: he did a story called Panther's Quest published in Marvel Comics Presents in 1989 and a four-issue prestige miniseries called Panther's Prey in 1991. This "Epic Collection" collects both of them, along with five short Black Panther tales by other creators from the same era.
Panther's Quest sends the Black Panther into South Africa in order to find his mother, missing since childhood. Sure, we did apartheid in a thinly fictionalized version of South Africa in the immediate previous Black Panther storyline, but why not do it again in the real place? This story ran twenty-five biweekly installments of (usually) eight pages... and it is interminable. Like, eight pages will go by and all that's happened is Black Panther has punched a guy. One thing I liked about McGregor's Panther's Rage was how it really made you feel the difficulty of what the Black Panther did, but this goes too far with it, because everything is immensely difficult, everything is enormously slowed down, it never feels like we're getting anywhere, being crushed under the weight of McGregor's enormously wordy style. Being set in South Africa means we again lose the worldbuilding that made Panther's Rage so interesting, too. It has it moments, including some nice side characters in South Africa, but ultimately, a tedious slog with little to say.
Thinking, thinking, always thinking. from Marvel Comics Presents vol. 1 #33 (script by Don McGregor, art by Gene Colan & Tom Palmer) |
And in the end, crack is still a problem in Wakanda! Way to cheer me up, McGregor. from Black Panther: Panther's Prey #4 (script by Don McGregor, art by Dwayne Turner) |
The other stories here are nice to have for completism's sake, but not very memorable.
Shadow & Claw: the first half of The Book of the New Sun
The Shadow of the Torturer and The Claw of the Conciliator
by Gene Wolfe
Gene Wolfe is one of those writers that though I've long been dimly aware of him, my curiosity about him was particularly stirred up by the denizens of /r/printSF, where he has a particularly vocal and adoring group of fans. His work is famously inscrutable; the introduction to this book (by Ada Palmer of the inscrutable Terra Ignota) says that there are science fiction books that are confusing to the inexperienced reader sf—and as those books are to easier books, so is The Book of the New Sun to those books. That is to say, there are some science fiction books you can only read once you have learned how to read science fiction, and Gene Wolfe you can only read once you have learned how to read Gene Wolfe. So I was pleased when I was gifted the new "Tor Essentials" editions of The Book of the New Sun, and I recently read the first one, which collects the first two books, The Shadow of the Torturer and The Claw of the Conciliator.
Collection published: 2021 Contents originally published: 1980-81 Acquired: May 2022 Read: July 2023 |
Book of the New Sun is about a member of the guild of torturers, Severian; Shadow of the Torturer covers his adolescence in the guild, and then the beginning of his exile, when he is en route to take up a post as executioner at a distant city. At first I was wondering if the inscrutability of the book was somewhat exaggerated; sure, you have to read carefully, but that's because Wolfe has dense, rich prose, and a tendency to jump around a bit chronologically (at first; it soon settles down). The world itself is a little obscure, but I had my theories. I enjoyed these early parts a lot—a richly described world in both the macro and micro senses. The dense, traditional, circumscribed world Severian moves through is fascinating and interesting. Additionally, I always like coming-of-age stuff, and this is a good example of it.
Once Severian leaves, though, the book gets weird. It actually reminds me of medieval quest narratives, or rather my most recent example of one (it has been a long time since I was in grad school, after all), the film adaptation of The Green Knight: bizarre, weird things keep happening... that are presented so matter-of-factly and received so matter-of-factly that they thus become even weirder and bizarre. Severian is recruited into a troupe of players, and one feels that this is going to be some kind of picaresque, but then he's challenged to a duel, and now he's in a botanical garden where people live, and then he's on a carriage that accidentally smashes through a group of nuns, and then when you think the story has forgotten all about that theatrical troupe, they somehow catch up to him and they're all performing a play together!
So it's less difficult in the sense that you don't know what's happening, and more difficult in the sense that the logic underpinning the story and world doesn't seem to be the logic of story and world we know here in the twentieth/twenty-first century. Like I said, it feels like a medieval text, in that it sort of comes across as something assembled retroactively from a bunch of disparate texts about Severian: why would the theatrical troupe reappear so much later? Well, because some later scribes stuck an unrelated story about Severian's duel into the middle of the text! So captivating, but if at the end of the book you wanted me to tell you what was actually going on, I'm not sure I could have done it.
I think Shadow of the Torturer balanced on just the right side of the weirdness, and had the opening segment to keep it grounded; the story's continuation in Claw of the Conciliator was more confusing to me, more piecemeal, too disorienting. Though I liked a lot of individual incidents, there were many aspects of the story I didn't follow at all, and ultimately I struggled through this in a way I hadn't with Shadow.
Still, they say you don't read Book of the New Sun, only reread it, so I am in for the long haul I guess. There are four books, plus a coda, and they are all part of the twelve-book "Solar Cycle" so it could be quite a long haul if I am willing! In the short term, though, I think I will certainly finish out The Book of the New Sun.
Volume 3 of DC's Justice Society of America comic (the one that began after 52 and came to an end with Flashpoint and the "New 52") is one of those titles that keeps getting sucked into crossovers and events, and thus what order you should read it in is not totally obvious. Thus, here I am to straighten it out for you.
Crossover/event titles are noted in bold.
Note that there were two books that seem like they ought to be part of this reading order, but I omitted. Justice Society of America Annual #2 ties into JSA All-Stars vol. 2, and is best read after #3 of that title; Justice Society of America Special #1 concludes a three-part storyline that began in Magog #11 and 12; there is no best place to read it because no one will ever trick me into reading Magog.
Star Trek: Deep Space Nine: Force and Motion
by Jeffrey Lang
Published: 2016 Acquired: October 2021 Read: July 2023 |
I read Destiny-era Star Trek books in batches of five every
few months. Next up in sequence: The Next Generation: Armageddon's Arrow by Dayton Ward
Galaxy Awards 1: Chinese Science Fiction Anthology
edited by Latssep and Francesco Verso
Before the Hugo voter's packet comes out, I do what I can to track down the works myself, so that I'm not dependent on the timing of the packet to do my reading. This year, I discovered that one of the Chinese finalists for Best Short Story, Channing Ren's "Resurrection," had been published in an anthology of sf translated from Chinese into English, so I picked it up. (Or, rather, I got my local library to buy a copy for its collection, and then borrowed it.) I liked "Resurrection" enough that when I finished my Hugo reading, I turned back to the anthology to read the other stories collected in it.
Collection published: 2022 Contents originally published: 2018-22 Read: October 2023 |
Galaxy Awards 1 collects eight pieces of short fiction published in the last five years; it isn't clearly indicated, but I believe they were all winners of the Chinese Galaxy Award for science fiction. Each story is included in both Chinese and English, and each is preceded by an illustration and a short note about the author.
Between this book and the stories that were Hugo finalists, my impression is that Chinese sf is a bit what an Anglophone sf reader might consider old-fashioned. Lots of scientists doing science things. Lots of what I think of as "invention stories"—stories that are set at the moment of the invention of a new technology, and so don't really explore the implications of it. The occasional twist ending that annoys more than delights. Other than "Resurrection" itself, which I enjoyed for its focus on a particular person confronting a strange new technology, the first five stories in this volume did little for me.
I think in theory both Lu Hang's "Tongji Bridge" and Hai Ya's "Fongon Temple Pagoda" could have been more interesting, as both are about how technology gets incorporated into a traditional Chinese institution, but in practice the stories were just not doing much: character decides to do this, they do it, the end. (I did think Hang's more interesting and character driven than Ya's, which I quickly began reading aggressively fast. Ya was also the author of the Hugo finalist "The Space-Time Painter," which I ended up not really evaluating because of translation issues.)
I found Jiang Bo's "Final Diagnosis" annoying—it has a super obvious twist at the end, but also does not lay the groundwork for its worldbuilding to convince, and its character work with the female lead is pretty poor. (Bo was the author of the Hugo finalist "On the Razor's Edge," which I also didn't care for.) "Turing Food Court" by Wang Nuonuo was interesting and well told, but again, the story is too much dependent on a final twist, and the details of the setting's technology seemed a bit too arbitrary. Why do robots need to be developed in pairs? Why does one need to destroy the other?
So five stories in, I was worried. But then I started Ben Lu's "Upstart" (this is the same author called "Lu Ban" on the Hugo ballot; he wrote "The White Cliff") and I ended up really enjoying it. This story was about a future where, in order to reduce overpopulation, people can voluntarily agree to have their lifespans shortened in exchange for a payout. The story focuses on one such "upstart," alternating between his original decision to undergo the procedure and his attempts decades later to have it undone. Neat worldbuilding, strong characterization, and a good twist at the end. Lu does a great job of thinking through how a world would be changed by a new technology, focusing not just on that initial moment of transition, but how it would look decades later. What kind of resistance to such an initiative would spring up? And then he goes ever further than that.
From the cheeseball title, I was dreading A Que's "2039: Era of Brain-Computer Interface" (and it really is a terrible title), but I ended up liking the story a lot. A man ends up in a car accident and needs an experimental brain-computer interface to escape paralysis; the story explores how it affects his relationship with his girlfriend, and most of the story is told from her perspective. Neat use of a new technology, good worldbuilding, and again, a good twist at the end. Not as strong as the story on either side of it, but still an enjoyable read.
Finally came what was my favorite story in the book, "Colour the World" by Congyun "Mu Ming" Gu. This is set in a future world where people can have their eyes enhanced to be more perceptive, seeing more gradations of color, and also interface with computers; the story focuses on a girl, who gets the new technology later than her peers but grows up to be a programmer for it, and her relationship with her mother, who never gets it at all. Great character focus, some beautiful writing that comes through in translation, neat exploration of how technology can literally give us new ways of seeing. Highly recommended, and it would be great story if you are interesting in explorations of the cyborg.
So, with four strong stories and four weak ones, it's certainly worth it as an anthology. That said, the book was for some reason released by an Italian press, and there are some irregularities in the proofing and layout; a character's name fluctuates in "Final Diagnosis," there are formatting errors in almost every author bio, the story titles are often inconsistent in different parts of the book, "2039" has random line breaks in the middle of paragraphs. Definitely the work of a small press.
The first has a framing narrative, set between Jerry Ordway's and Bill Willingham's runs on the parent title. In the frame, the JSA brownstone becomes subject to dream logic, as characters move through time and appear and disappear at random. I kind of suspect this was picked to smooth over discontinuities between stories, but I didn't care because I thought it worked really well. It has a good dreamlike feeling to it, as characters disappear between page transitions and the logic is a bit hard to follow but also not totally random.
from Justice Society of America 80-Page Giant #1 (script by Zander Cannon, art by Scott Hampton) |
The other two collections have no frame; they're just collections of seven stories apiece. Typically, a few stories take place at the "now" of when the issue was released, and then a few must take place earlier on in the run of Justice Society vol. 3 based on what characters are present. These I liked for their spotlights on characters who may have been present in the main title, but were often unfocused on as it jerked from big event to big event. For example, one of my complaints about the parent title would be how Obsidian was either demoted to a disembodied presence or turned into an egg or going nuts again, so I appreciated "...the Not-So-Secret Origin of Obsidian!" (Marc Andreyko, Mike Norton, and Bill Sienkiewicz), which gave some unity to his disparate appearances and connected to what was being done with the character in Manhunter at the same time.
Liberty Belle/Jesse Quick quickly established herself as a favorite in Justice Society vol. 3 even though I felt like she didn't actually get much to do, so I enjoyed "Unstoppable" (Robert T. Jeschonek and Victor Ibàñez) where she takes on abusers, and "Guiding the Gifted" (Drew Ford, Andy Smith, and Keith Champagne), where she protects a kid with new powers. They both had a good domestic focus, but also a clear indication of how she doesn't take any crap. (Should I expand this ever-lengthening project to track down her appearances in Titans?) And again, there was a good Citizen Steel story in "The Tin Man" (Matthew Cody and Tim Seeley), where he falls in love with a patient he can never touch. I never really liked Steel much in the main series, so I was grateful for the positive focus these issues gave him.
from Justice Society of America 80-Page Giant 2011 #1 (script by Adam Beechen, art by Howard Chaykin) |
Overall, I was often disappointed with how Justice Society vol. 3 was jerked from big event to big event, eschewing the character focus that makes team books so appealing to me. These three anthologies did a lot to rectify that, and I was glad I incorporated them into my reading experience. Alas, the stories are not collected so far as I know, and the issues are not available on DC Universe Infinite, so if you want to follow my lead, you'll need to track them down on the secondary market.
Justice Society of America 80-Page Giant (Jan. 2010), Justice Society of America 80-Page Giant 2010 (Dec. 2010), and Justice Society of American 80-Page Giant 2011 (Aug. 2011) were each originally published in one issue. The stories were written by James Robinson, Felicia D. Henderson, Kevin Grevioux, Jerry Ordway, Jen Van Meter, Zander Cannon, Lilah Sturges, Marc Andreyko, Robert T. Jeschonek, Justin Peniston, Christina Weir & Nunzio DeFilippis, Jason Starr, Freddie Williams II, Brandon Jerwa, Steve Niles, B. Clay Moore, Matt Kindt, Matthew Cody, Drew Ford, Ivan Brandon, and Adam Beechen. They were pencilled by Neil Edwards, Renato Guedes, Roberto Castro, Jerry Ordway, Jesus Merino, Scott Hampton, Freddie Williams II, Mike Norton, Victor Ibàñez, Tonci Zonjic, Jesse Delperdang, Leandro Fernandez, Mateus Santolouco, Josh Adams, Tim Seeley, Andy Smith, Nic Klein, and Howard Chaykin, and they were inked by Wayne Faucher, José Wilson Magalhaes, John Floyd, Jerry Ordway, Jesse Delperdang, Scott Hampton, Freddie Williams II, Bill Sienkiewicz, Victor Ibàñez, Tonci Zonjic, Jesus Merino, Leandro Fernandez, Mateus Santolouco, Bob McLeod, Tim Seeley, Keith Champagne, Nic Klein, and Howard Chaykin. Colors were provided by Mike Thomas, David Curiel, Allan Passalaqua, Danny Vozzo, the Hories, Zac Atkinson, Tonci Zonjic, Alex Bleyaert, Chris Beckett, Mateus Santolouco, Thomas Chu, Nic Klein, and Jesus Aburtov, and letters by Rob Leigh, John J. Hill, and Swands. The stories were edited by Chris Conroy, Rachel Gluckstern, Mike Carlin, and Joey Cavalieri.
Here is my last set of Hugo ballots: these are all the book-based categories, including the biggie, Best Novel. I don't think I nominated in any of these categories, but I'm not sure. I really should have made a note somewhere.
4. Legends & Lattes by Travis Baldree
I did not like this at all, a mediocre novel with no interesting characters and no stakes and bleh prose. See my review linked above for more.
3. No Award
I try not to be an overdramatic hater, but really, if Legends & Lattes wins, it will be one of those books that makes me question the judgement of my fellow Worldcon members so much that I will wonder why I am even participating in this process.
3. The Daughter of Doctor Moreau by Silvia Moreno-Garcia
Up until the last third or so, I thought this was going to slot in above The Spare Man. I wasn't in love with it, but it was doing some kind of interesting stuff. But the revelations near the end and the overly neat ending brought it down for me. Ultimately it came across as an unambitious novel that ought to have been ambitious. Spare Man, I think, largely does what it says it will do, but this does not.
2. The Spare Man by Mary Robinette Kowal
Sometimes ranking almost feels too easy, you know? Like, you want ranking to be a challenge because that means you have a lot of very good books. (Or, well, a lot of very bad ones.) But The Spare Man has a very obvious slot to take. It was not incompetent or annoying, so it clearly goes above No Award, but I also didn't think it came across as one of the best books of the year, or even a great one, so clearly below Nettle and Bone.
1. Nettle and Bone by T. Kingfisher
Interestingly, I think Legends & Lattes and Nettle and Bone have a bit in common—even beyond the use of the "[NOUN] & [NOUN]" title format. (I think the Kingfisher was actually Nettle & Bone in the US, but I read the UK edition.) They're both fantasy novels that aim to provide reassurance to the reader in the face of darkness of the world: but while Legends & Lattes does this by having no stakes and mediocre humor, aiming for "heart," Nettle and Bone really does have heart because Kingfisher knows that in fiction, you can only get reassurance by having darkness to be reassured about. Nettle and Bone was an easy favorite for me as soon as I read it.
2. Blood, Sweat & Chrome: The Wild and True Story of Mad Max: Fury Road by Kyle Buchanan
This is an oral history of the long production of Mad Max: Fury Road, mostly from interviews by the author, with some archival material mixed in. I have actually never seen Fury Road, but found this pretty interesting nonetheless. The long genesis of the film was interesting in particular; I felt that the filming process needed more details on what exactly Tom Hardy's issue was (the book seemed to dance around this), but was still neat, as was the postproduction stuff. Probably I would get more out of the book if I—like the writer and many participants—was convinced of George Miller's genius, but I do like a good making-of book, and this is a decent one.
1. Terry Pratchett: A Life with Footnotes by Rob Wilkins
This is a biography of the Discworld author by his longtime assistant, based on notes Pratchett made toward an autobiography that he never got around to writing. Lots of good details on Pratchett's youth and early career especially; I liked hearing about his working as a journalist and as a press officer for a nuclear power plant in particular. There's also great but devastating insight into his later years, as the cognitive decline of Alzheimer's began to take hold. I did think that at times Wilkins is (for perhaps natural reasons) a bit too into Pratchett's finances and contracts, and I felt like Pratchett's wife totally disappeared from the book, but if you're even a mild Pratchett fan (which is where I would categorize myself) there's a lot to get out of this book. This is a strong work about a key figure in the sf&f field, exactly the kind of thing the Hugo Award for Best Related Work ought to be rewarding.
(Abigail Nussbaum has a very good negative review of the book that I largely agree with... but I still think it's the best thing in the category!)
[UNRANKED] Bloodmarked by Tracy Deonn / Dreams Bigger than Heartbreak by Charlie Jane Anders
Both of these are sequels to previous Lodestar Award finalists. Bloodmarked is a follow-up to 2021's Legendborn, where students at a North Carolina college turn out to be Arthurian knights reborn to fight monsters from another dimension... or something. It did not work for me, and I ranked it fifth. Dreams Bigger than Heartbreak is a sequel to 2022's Victories Greater than Death, a book I almost abandoned halfway through and ended up ranking sixth and one of the very reasons I instituted my "you are allowed to skip a book" rule this year. It seemed very unlikely that the sequels were likely to be serious contenders for me, and so in the interests of time, I skipped them.
5. Osmo Unknown and the Eightpenny Woods by Catherynne M. Valente
This is a fantasy novel about a kid who goes into a magical forest in order to fulfill his role in an ancient treaty between humans and the creatures of the forest. Though I have enjoyed some of Valente's work (she had three works on the Hugo short fiction ballots last year, and they were all strong), too often I am left feeling that if it had been half as long, it would have been twice as good. Most of her books are overnarrated; perhaps in deference to the younger audience, this mostly manages to avoid that (though the narrator is still twee and condescending), but instead fills up the pages with voluminous "funny" dialogue that goes nowhere. At one point the main character gets horns on his head but doesn't know it, and somehow there is a full ten pages of back-and-forth between Osmo being confused at another character saying "what's up with your head?" and someone finally saying "you've got horns!" By about page one hundred, this book had squandered all of its goodwill and I did not care about what anyone was trying to do, but there were another three hundred pages I had to read.
I did like the pangolin character a bit.
4. No Award
Look, other people must like it, but I feel like Osmo Unknown is bad. And it's a kind of bad that annoys me: like Seanan McGuire's, Valente's YA is self-consciously nostalgic in a way I find forced and annoying. Rather than capture what the fantasy of our childhood was actually like, it very archly tries to capture our nostalgia for reading fantasy in childhood—which isn't the same thing at all. Oz may be a fairly whimsical place, but the book doesn't smash your face into this fact, it just gets on with taking the world seriously. I don't believe actual young adults (or middle-graders, which is what Osmo Unknown skews toward in my opinion) would actually like this book. It's for adults nostalgic for when they were supposed to be reading young adult fiction. And this is, you know, a YA award.
3. Akata Woman by Nnedi Okorafor
As noted in my review, I did not find this as successful as the second book in this series. But, you know, it is fundamentally an actual young adult book in my opinion, so it's better than Osmo Unknown and better than No Award.
2. The Golden Enclaves by Naomi Novik
I had actually read this before voting because I enjoyed the previous book in the series so much. Like Akata Woman, it's the third book in a series where it turns out I liked the second book best. But though it was a bit of a letdown, I still enjoyed it well enough. In another year, though, it's hard for me to imagine this taking second on my ballot.
1. In the Serpent's Wake by Rachel Hartman
Like every other book on the ballot this year bar Osmo Unknown, this is a sequel to a previous finalist, and like every one of those sequels (that I read, anyway), this is not as strong as the book that preceded it. But I think I liked this best of all; honestly, I could go either way between it and The Golden Enclaves, both of which didn't totally deliver on the potential of where the previous installment had left off. I'll give the edge to this because I suspect Novik has the edge with the majority of the electorate, but again, it's hard for me to imagine this being my top choice in any previous year.
Final Thoughts
Last year, I said that Best Novel was the weakest set I'd seen since I began voting in 2017. Well, it got worse! Very frustrating. I don't keep up with current sf&f much beyond reading for the Hugos, so I don't know what those books might be, but Nettle and Bone aside I believe there has to have been five books better than this. I don't have a strong sense of what will win this category; perhaps Nettle and Bone? Kingfisher has done pretty well on the ballot the past few years. Kowal is always popular, but I don't feel like Spare Man is going to be it. It was a bit surprising to see the Scalzi, and I think he has enough detractors I don't think it will be him. Oh god, it's going to be Legends & Lattes, isn't it?
On the other hand, this was a great set of Related Works finalists. I always grumble a bit when they skew away from nonfiction, but here we have five works of nonfiction; I also grumble when they're not books, but here we have five actual books. I think the Pratchett biography will win.
As I indicated above, this was also a weak set of YA finalists. Five of the six were sequels to previous nominees! C'mon, give me something new. I don't have a good sense at all of what might win here. Novik won last year, though some people grumbled about that. (I am not sure why; I think her books are much more clearly YA than whatever Osmo Unknown was supposed to be.)