Showing posts with label creator: andy weir. Show all posts
Showing posts with label creator: andy weir. Show all posts

02 August 2022

Hugos 2022: Project Hail Mary by Andy Weir

Project Hail Mary by Andy Weir

Andy Weir's The Martian was self-published electronically in 2011, and then republished by a traditional publisher in 2014, which is when it went big; this meant that by the time people noticed it, it was no longer eligible for a Hugo Award. (Weir did win the Astounding Award for Best New Writer in 2015, however, on the basis of The Martian, as even though it is administered alongside the Hugos, it has different eligibility rules.) Weir's next novel, Artemis (2017), had a much more mixed reception; I never read it, but critical reception made it seem like he tried something new, and it wasn't within his skillset as a writer. It didn't make the 2016 Hugo ballot (it was about twenty-five nominating ballots short, putting it five positions down).

Published: 2021
Acquired and read: July 2022

Well, Weir is back on familiar ground with Project Hail Mary, and it is thus little surprise that he is finally a Hugo finalist. Like The Martian, Project Hail Mary is about a single science expert struggling to survive on his own in space—although in this case, the entire future of the human race depends on him. I called The Martian an example of Golden-Age science fiction, and PHM is similar: a scientist boldly sciencing his way out of problems. I enjoyed it, particularly the exploration of an alien biology in the form of the astrophage, a space-based life-form that feeds on the light of stars. Weir does a good job extrapolating from the idea of the astrophage.

The big difference between Project Hail Mary and an actual work of Golden Age sf is that PHM is much much longer. Novels were a rarity back then, and when they existed, they ran about 200 pages at most. PHM is over twice as long, and around page 350, I was bored with the formula. 1) Everything seems fine. 2) Something unexpected goes wrong. 3) There is a perfectly rational scientific explanation for this. 4) There is a perfectly rational scientific solution for this. When something went wrong around this point, I just groaned, because I could see exactly how it would play out... and indeed the formula repeated two more times beyond that.

Unfortunately, there's nothing else to get you through Project Hail Mary. Not theme, nor character work. Weir is the kind of writer where his supporting characters have no more characterization than "Russian." His main character isn't much better: there's an attempt at an interesting idea with him being too cowardly to go to space, but somehow he's done it anyway, but 1) it wasn't clear to me he was meant to be a coward until someone actually said it aloud, and 2) you might think the book would then be about overcoming cowardice, but instead his cowardice is treated as a mystery, and once you know the reason he went to space despite his cowardice, it never comes up again.

It's clear that this book works for many. I think there's a version of it that could have worked for me; after all, I did enjoy The Martian. And I did laugh at one good joke. But I found this a bit of a pointless slog in the end.

18 January 2016

Review: The Martian by Andy Weir

Mass market paperback, 435 pages
Published 2015 (originally 2011)

Borrowed from my wife
Read December 2015
The Martian by Andy Weir

I cross-post reviews from this blog on LibraryThing, where some 483 people have already reviewed The Martian, and so you don't need me to say if it's good or not, or if you should read it or not; you've already decided that, or you've decided you don't care. So instead you're going to get a semi-random pile of observations.

I probably wouldn't have read this (I am rubbish at picking up recent books [i.e., books published since the year 1900] if they aren't Star Trek books), but my wife bought it when she found it its protagonist was (like her) a botanist and insisted that I read it. Plus I wanted to see the film, so I figured I'd read it beforehand, because as much adaptation theory as I've read, I might intellectually believe that books and films are just different things in different media, but somewhere within my heart does lurk a book snob who watches movies and complains about all the things they changed. Anyway, it took me so long to read it despite my solid intentions of doing so that the movie's theatrical run has ended, so I guess I'm renting it from the library, which is a little bit of a shame, as I have made a point of seeing all the recent space movies that aren't about space battles (i.e., Moon, Gravity, and Interstellar), as it's a genre whose existence I'd like to see continue, and now I won't be supporting it financially.

That Mark Watney has a graduate degree in botany actually seems inaccurate: his specialty is in cultivating plants, which no botanist I've met does-- plus there's a joke about how everyone in his Masters program just wanted to grow weed, which really does not track with my experience. Perhaps a degree in horticulture would have made more sense? Watney is also a mechanical engineer, and clearly not only by training, but by temperament. My father is a mechanical engineer, and Watney reminds me of him: he looks at problems and he sees solutions, he tries and tries again and again to fix things himself, and he takes real pleasure in his abilities to come up with unconventional solutions. This line especially made me think of him: "I am smiling a great smile. The smile of a man who fucked with his car and didn't break it." Except I'm not sure I've ever heard my father say the f-word.

The Martian is, in a way, real Golden Age science fiction: what Asimov would call Stage Two, technology dominant. This is one of those stories where the whole point is seeing someone science his way out of a scientific problem, but instead of being a short story like most Golden Age sf, it's a whole novel-- but despite what conventional wisdom might have told us, it never wears out its welcome, and is usually quite fun. Seeing Watney move from problem to problem to problem has a thrill all its own, and I was impressed with how Weir kept me engaged throughout. Yes, the characters are thin (at least two of them seem to have had no more thought put into them than being "the girl one"!), but they're not the point. It's fun to see him figure out how to jury-rig a probe for communication, or triangulate his way out of a dust storm, or build a trailer.

Indeed, when Weir stretches out into something other than problem-solving is when the book fumbles a little; I found the moral about humans reaching out to help each other a little hollow given that the money, man-hours, and resources put into saving Mark Watney probably could have saved dozens or hundreds of other lives right here on Earth. The only thing I genuinely and completely didn't like was when Weir shifted into a third-person perspective for Mark, like when the airlock blew off the Hab. It jarred with the first-person perspective used for most of his scenes. Less bothersome was the somewhat transparent Hand of the Author at times; Mark is in communication with Earth exactly the right amount to make the plot work, and then he's on his own to stop the drama from flattening.

Upon finishing the novel, I looked up Andy Weir and not only discovered that does he write Doctor Who fanfiction about President Romana (why aren't you employing him, Big Finish?), but also realized that he was behind Casey and Andy, a mediocre 2002-08 webcomic that I never read consistently, but did occasionally dip into (because Weir is friends with David Morgan-Mar, creator of the excellent Irregular Webcomic!). And now he's made it big with a bestselling novel turned into a Ridley Scott film. It took him years to become an overnight success. It's a weird old world sometimes. (If you want to read about how The Martian made the transition from postings on Weir's cheap-ass website to blockbuster film, check out this highly informative podcast interview; it even has a full-text transcript, which allows it to overcome one of the things I hate about podcasts, which is that it takes me way longer to listen to something than to read it.)