Showing posts with label blog: reading project tuesday. Show all posts
Showing posts with label blog: reading project tuesday. Show all posts

15 July 2025

Hugos 2025: Service Model by Adrian Tchaikovsky

Service Model by Adrian Tchaikovsky

Originally published: 2024
Acquired: May 2025
Read: July 2025

Cover blurbs are interesting, in that they give you a sense of what kind of reader the publisher thinks a book will appeal to. For example, following the publication of Ancillary Justice, it seemed to me that basically every book with any vague space opera trappings was blurbed by Ann Leckie. I was surprised, then, to note that Adrian Tchaikovksky's Service Model was blurbed by John Scalzi, because it's hard for me to imagine that there is significant overlap there. Tchaikovsky writes hard sf with a biological bent, which isn't really the Scalzi tone at all. But as I began reading Service Model, I got it.

This is supposed to be funny.

Unfortunately, I didn't find it funny at all, aside from one joke about remote work. The book is about a valet robot who accidentally(?) kills its owner and then goes on a quest for purpose; the book takes place after the majority of human have died, and only robots remain. The book goes from the robot's original estate, to the central planning office for robots, to a collective farm, to a library, to God. What might have been a perfectly fine novella is a bloated tedious novel; there are by no means enough ideas, depth, or character work to fill almost 400 pages. 

It read quickly, at least.

08 July 2025

Hugos 2025: A Sorceress Comes to Call by Ursula Vernon

I have enjoyed a lot of previous books and stories by T. Kingfisher/Ursula Vernon, but this one didn't do it for me at all. I find it a bit hard to enumerate exactly why, to be honest, but I'm going to try.

The book has two protagonists. One is the daughter of a sorceress; the sorceress has (among other powers) the ability to make people "obedient," which forces them to do exactly what she wants. She often uses this on her own daughter as a form of punishment, making her do certain things she doesn't actually want to do. When the book opens, the mother decides she wants to get married, so the two of them head off to woo a rich man, the sorceress coming up with an excuse for them to be houseguests. (The book seems to take place in a place that is vaguely nineteenth-century Britain, though not exactly.)

The other protagonist is the middle-aged sister of the sorceress's target, who is skeptical of this woman intruding into their lives and decides to get rid of her... but also eventually realizes that this woman's daughter needs saving from her too.

A Sorceress Comes to Call by T. Kingfisher

Published: 2024
Acquired: April 2025
Read: July 2025
In the acknowledgements, Vernon says her influence was the genre of regency romance but it more reminded me of Victorian sensation novels by Wilkie Collins or Mary Elizabeth Braddon (or later writers influenced by them, like Thomas Hardy), where the main threat is that the Wrong Marriage is going to happen with catastrophic consequences. Unfortunately, compared to these novelists, the book very much comes up short. In a book by Collins or Braddon or Hardy, one very much feels the threat of the marriage, the inexorable pull of how it's going to wreck everyone's life. But I found that the tone didn't really come across here, as the sister would talk about how big a threat the sorceress was... but then kind of just sit around and throw a big house party, which didn't seem to correlate. Tonally, the moment where the book really fails is that the sorceress succeeds in marrying the brother... but the characters don't react with horror or anything, they're just like "oh well" and continue with their plans to try to stop (now undo) the marriage. I thought it was very weirdly handled, very much a lost opportunity.

The book is, unfortunately, filled with little moments that don't quite vibe right and thus stopped me from feeling invested. The daughter's only friend in her mother's household is their family's horse; it's supposed to be a big betrayal that the horse is actually her mother's familiar and has thus been funneling information to the mother all along... but we've only just been told this about the horse, so it doesn't come across at all. I had very little sense of what the brother saw in the sorceress; the linchpin of the sorceress's plan is that the brother is in love with her but the sorceress can't use magic to make this happen, yet we don't really get to see how she wins him over. Everyone else is onto her so quickly it makes the brother seem like quite a dunderhead. The sister has this subplot about not wanting to marry the guy she's in love with, but it never clearly came across why she had turned him down.

It's a shame because the basic concept of making people obedient and using it to explore the dynamics of child abuse seems quite potent, but I felt like the book largely squandered it. I don't think there's one big way in which this book whiffed it, but add up all my complaints above, and you end up with a book I never engaged with on any level, perhaps the first time that's ever happened to me with Vernon/Kingfisher.

17 June 2025

Hugos 2025: The Ministry of Time by Kaliane Bradley

I try to approach Hugo finalists with as few expectations as possible. If I don't know anything about a book going in, I try to keep that the case, so that the book can surprise me (for good or for ill) purely on its own terms. This was mostly true with The Ministry of Time, but I didn't quite manage it. One, I knew that some people on r/printSF didn't like it for being frivolous or lightweight, and, two, the book's own paratext gives that impression, with blurbs that say things like "An outrageously fun comedy" and "A delightfully audacious screwball comedy." Not that I don't like fun books or comedy books, I love them in fact... but I typically very much have not loved books that Hugo nominators think are fun comedies (e.g., Space OperaLegends & Lattes, anything by John Scalzi), unless they're by T. Kingfisher.

The Ministry of Time by Kaliane Bradley

Originally published: 2024
Acquired: April 2025
Read: May 2025

Well, the blurbs are all wrong because it's not a comedy, screwball or otherwise. Bizarrely wrong. Sure, there are some good jokes—indeed, there's one thoroughly excellent one that had be guffawing—but a book can have lots of jokes and still not be a comedy, and I certainly wouldn't read this if you were looking for one. In fact, if it owes anything to any genre outside of science fiction itself, it's clearly spy fiction; the title is a tip of the hat to Graham Greene. (I haven't actually got to The Ministry of Fear yet, but I have read a lot of his other stuff, and I've never read one I haven't liked.)

I don't want to say too much about the book here because I myself think I benefited from not knowing much about it, but the basic premise is that in the near future, the UK government has the technology to pull people out of the past, and they're testing it by pulling out people who are known to have died but their bodies weren't found, thus ensuring no timeline changes; the narrator is the "bridge" assigned to help polar explorer Graham Gore acclimate to the present day. (Gore is a real person, who died trying to find the Northwest Passage; so too did everyone else on his expedition.) The narrator used to work as a translator for the UK government, dealing with refugees, and is half-Cambodian herself.

It's a time-travel story, of course, but it's also a story about translation, about resettlement, told through an sfnal lens, about how we translate ourselves, about how we assimilate to other societies. It's about the past and how its attitudes are always with us—even into the future. I found it astutely observed, lots of great character-focused scenes that were beautifully told. At the time that I read it, I had three more finalist for Best Novel to read, but it was very clear to me this would be the one to beat. This is science fiction doing what only that genre can do, but doing it in a way that isn't generic at all. It's not a book everyone would love, I think, but it's a book I would love—it's not a big part of the book, but I loved how it interrogated our ideas about what it actually means to be "Victorian."

Two quibbles, one the author's fault, one not. No one in 1847 would ever use the phrase "career scientist" (p. 139). The term "scientist" was not yet widespread, and you certainly couldn't have a career as one, in fact you were much more likely to have the opposite! My second is that the note on p. 346 talks about the included illustrations, sketched by the actual Graham Gore... but my 2025 Sceptre paperback has no illustrations! I assume they were in the original hardcover edition. If you're gonna take them out, then make sure you also take out the note discussing them, guys.

10 June 2025

Hugos 2025: The Tainted Cup by Robert Jackson Bennett

One of my goals in reading Hugo finalists is to gain more exposure to contemporary writers of great sf&f—otherwise, I am perpetually behind. Robert Jackson Bennett is one of those writers I have been interested in but never gotten around to; his "Divine Cities" sequence sounded interesting when it was a finalist for the Best Series Hugo (a category I do not read for). So I was gratified when his most recent novel, The Tainted Cup, was a finalist for Best Novel this year.

The Tainted Cup by Robert Jackson Bennett

Originally published: 2024
Acquired: April 2025
Read: May 2025
This is a speculative detective novel—appropriately enough!—that's clearly inspired by Sherlock Holmes somewhat. We have an autistic coded detective, and their junior partner; the detective, Ana, is so perceptive that, just like Holmes, she can even make better observations than her junior partner of scenes where she is not present. Din, the junior partner, has a magically-enhanced memory, and he goes to the crime scenes while she does not, and he when he recounts the details to her, she puts together the significance of things that (to use Holmes's formulation) Din saw but did not observe. Ana is autistic-coded, but Din also has a learning disability, as he struggles to understand written text.

The novel takes place in a fantastic empire, one beset from without by massive leviathans and from within by crime and corruption. It opens with Ana and Din investigating the murder of an engineer responsible for the massive sea walls that protect the empire from the leviathans, but they soon discover (of course) a vast conspiracy. It's not the kind of mystery that follows the classic W. H. Auden formulation ("a murder occurs; many are suspected; all but one suspect, who is the murderer, are eliminated; the murderer is arrested or dies") where the reader solves the mystery alongside the detectives, but rather the kind of a procedural thriller where you slowly move through a world, uncovering details that allow the characters to unlock what's going on. 

It's a pleasure to read. The characters are strongly drawn and interesting, and Bennett is strong on tone and atmosphere. Beyond that, Bennett gets that the pleasure of a speculative novel is that (as Jo Walton says, oft-quoted by me) the world itself is a mystery that the reader gets to uncover. This is a rich, immersive world, and much of the pleasure of the book is in that it feels real with what seems to to be minimal effort on Bennett's part. I enjoyed reading this a lot; once I'm done with reading this year's Hugo finalists, I will definitely be picking up the second book, which is already out, and I'm happy to see that a third is already in the works. It feels like the kind of premise that could keep chugging along for a while quite effectively. Both these characters and this world have a lot more mystery for the reader to uncover.

03 June 2025

Hugos 2025: What Feasts at Night by T. Kingfisher

Ursula Vernon (who usually writes for adults or even YA audiences as "T. Kingfisher") has been one of my favorite discoveries from my reading of Hugo Award finalists. Since I began in 2017, I think there hasn't been a single year where she hasn't been on the ballot in at least one category. I have very much come to appreciate her humor, her sensitivity, her focus on the forgotten and unseen. A Wizard's Guide to Defensive Baking is particularly excellent.

What Feasts at Night by T. Kingfisher

Originally published: 2024
Acquired: April 2025
Read: May 2025
One of this year's Best Novella finalists is What Feasts at Night, a sequel to What Moves the Dead, her Best Novella finalist from 2023. I ranked it first, but it bafflingly finished in fourth. What Moves the Dead was about a soldier from a Ruritanian country travelling to another small European country, where they encountered evil alien fungus. I found it funny and cleverly done. It seems like fantasy horror at first, but it eventually becomes clear the book is actually science fiction.

But... did it need a sequel? Did the sequel need to be a Hugo finalist? I enjoyed going back to these characters, but unfortunately the story here is up to much less than in the first book. Someone is getting sick, and Alex very slowly investigates. It's a bit too obvious what's going on. While in the first book you might have some inkling, I think there that worked to generated dread—here it mostly drags on. What you think is going in is exactly what is going on, and unlike in What Moves the Dead, there's no clever explanation; it's just a mythical creature. I found it pretty disappointing.

But still! Kingfisher is engaging enough a writer that you still enjoy a lot of it. Lots of humor, and the narrator has a great voice, and the side characters are vivid, almost Dickensian sorts. I enjoyed most of the ride, even if I wasn't really sure why I was on it or if it was even going anywhere. I'm not really sure why this book exists, in that I think Kingfisher ought to have waited until she had a stronger premise for a second book in this sequence, and I'm really not sure why it's a Hugo finalist... but I certainly had a much less pleasant time reading some other inexplicable Hugo finalists.

27 May 2025

Hugos 2025: Alien Clay by Adrian Tchaikovsky

Adrian Tchaikovsky has his devoted fans— 2015's Children of Time, which I read for the first time last year, has many adherents!—but it's taken a while for him to break through into the Worldcon sphere and become a Hugo finalist. In 2022, he was a finalist for Best Novella, and in both 2023 and 2024 for Best Series. (In fact, he won Best Series in 2024, but disavowed his win once the issues with the Chengdu Hugo Awards came out.) 

Alien Clay by Adrian Tchaikovsky

Originally published: 2024
Acquired: April 2025
Read: May 2025
This year, he's finally broken to to the big one... not once, but twice, as Alien Clay and his novel Service Model are both finalists. The first of the two I read was Alien Clay, a first-person novel about a biologist exiled to a labor camp on a recently discovered alien planet by an oppressive government. He must navigate the politics and personalities of his new environment, while also trying to understand the strangeness of this bizarre ecosystem.

I thought the novel opened very strongly, with an arrestingly written description of the pods carrying the political prisoners down to the planet. I liked the depiction of the prison colony a lot, and the discussion of the politics seemed pretty well done, especially the tension in how an oppressive government might see the value of science... but only if science affirms how it wants to see itself. It's a tension, all to unfortunately, that we've been seeing in the United States in 2025. I particularly liked the character of the prison warden, a man who sees himself as an intellectual but is still the instrument of a brutal, repressive regime. The biology is, I assume, well thought out, but well thought out biology doesn't interest me for its own sake.

Unfortunately, as it went on, I got less interested in it. I don't think protagonists have to have "character development" per se (surely an overrated idea among amateur critics if there ever was one), but I do think there needs to be some kind of interesting push-and-pull to them, a feeling of things being in tension that the narrative explores. I never really felt this with the narrator, who kind of just does his thing until the book ends. I wanted to feel like more was at stake for him. Specifically, he seems to be a guy with a bit of an ego (he is a scientist with a successful career, after all), but he's also part of a movement and undergoes a transformation that both seem like they involve denying the self somewhat, and I never really had a sense of conflict here—and surely that would be relevant to the novel's themes about how we need to learn to not see ourselves and our assumptions in what we study. (It is, to be honest, a bit Solaris-y, but Tchaikovsky goes in a very different direction to Lem or Tarkovsky, so I don't mind; sf is full of variations on themes.) By the end, despite the strong opening, I was a little bored, feeling like Tchaikovsky didn't totally deliver on the interesting ideas he set up at the beginning.

20 May 2025

Hugos 2025: Someone You Can Build a Nest In by John Wiswell

This was the first finalist I read for the Hugo Award for Best Novel. It's a fantasy novel about a monster who lives in the woods in a fantasy kingdom, and a family comes to kill it to rid itself of a curse. The monster kills people (and other animals) to keep itself alive, absorbing body parts it needs into itself. Only the novel is told from the perspective of the monster, who finds herself falling in love with one of the members of the family that comes to kill it!

Someone you can Build a Nest in by John Wiswell

Published: 2024
Acquired and read: April 2025

Obviously this worked for a lot of people, or it wouldn't be a Hugo finalist. It didn't work for me. I can even imagine that it could work for me, it's a fun premise that could also be a disturbing one. I haven't seen other people online make this comparison, but I very much got Legends & Lattes vibes off the whole thing: despite the grossness of some of the material here, it ultimately feels rather anodyne and twee. Does this count as "cozy fantasy"?

Unfortunately, it probably does. The two characters fall in love, congrats, that's it. Why do they do this? I dunno, I guess they're nice? I found most of the characters one-note, and the worldbuilding shallow. I think fundamentally the premise is a good one, but having come up with it, it seemed like Wiswell was done; I think a good premise is a jumping-off point for complexity but this book takes its premise as an end point. What's the point of horror tropes if there's never a sense of real danger or jeopardy?

I will say that the book did manage to wrongfoot me with how the prophecy was resolved; that was mildly clever. Indeed, "mildly clever" might be the damning cover blurb for this novel. It might work for you, whoever you are, but it certainly didn't for me.

13 May 2025

Hugos 2025: "Lake of Souls" and Other Stories by Ann Leckie

Lake of Souls collects all of the short fiction by sf&f writer Ann Leckie to date; compared to some writers (say, Sarah Pinsker), this isn't very much. Leckie is clearly much more at home in the longer form than the shorter. The book contains eighteen stories: three from the world of the Imperial Radch (though, like most of Leckie's returns to this setting, not set in the actual Radch), seven from the world of her fantasy novel Raven Tower, and eight works not linked to larger settings, including one story original to this volume, "Lake of Souls," which is a finalist for the Hugo Award for Best Novelette. I read the volume prior to the Hugo finalists being announced, but did not get around to reviewing it until after.

The useful thing about reading a short fiction collection is that it really allows you to triangulate what interests a writer. Prior to reading Lake of Souls, I'd read every novel by Ann Leckie... but that amounts to, arguably, just five stories (the original Ancillary trilogy, Provenance, Translation State, and Raven Tower). Add on the stories in this book, and I've gone from five stories to twenty-three! With this broader sample size, you obtain a deeper understanding of what Ann Leckie is interested in, what she's using her fiction to figure out.

Lake of Souls: The Collected Short Fiction by Ann Leckie

Collection published: 2024
Contents originally published: 2006-24
Acquired: July 2024
Read: March 2025
One thing that clearly drives her fiction is the way that our biology shapes our needs and desires. This is most obvious in the title story, "Lake of Souls," which has parallel narratives about the unusual life cycle of an alien species and a human explorer trying to work it out, but we also see this in "The Endangered Camp," "The Justified," and Translation State. Even more specifically, there's definitely an obsession with eating, with sentient beings that can devour other sentient beings. In a more metaphorical sense, this is the premise that drives the Ancillary trilogy: the Radch devours the bodies of other cultures to sustain its own imperialist conquests. The stories here and elsewhere ask what are the ethical imperatives of consumption—if you are driven to do this by biological need, is it wrong to eat other sapient beings?

Biology also comes into her fiction through an interest in parentage. To what extent are our actions determined by those of our parents or other ancestors? Can we escape them or move beyond them? Does parentage shape our actions even if we are adopted or raised by someone else? Both her novels Provenance and Raven Tower were about this to some degree, as are many of the stories here: "Another Word for World," "Bury the Dead," "She Commands Me and I Obey," and "The Snake's Wife." In these stories, children work to escape to the shadows of their parents, to forge their own identities.

Perhaps both of these concepts are examples of a larger interest in what we might call "systems of constraint." We also see this in the stories that come from the world of Raven Tower. (Though one should note the short fiction all preceded the novel; it developed the ideas she originated there.) As I discussed in my review of that novel, Leckie is "very good at the sf thing of taking a what if? and thinking through its implications. Here, the conceit is that praying to or making offering to gods gives them powers, and that anything a god says is true becomes true: if so, how would this work? We get a lot of different permutations of this, many of them quite clever. Yes, technically it's fantasy, but like (say) Jemisin in The Fifth Season, it's approached with an sf worldbuilder's mindset, which is how I like my fantasy." All the Raven Tower stories take this basic premise of how godhood works and explore its ramifications in various ways. 

To me, these were—for much the same reason I enjoyed the novel—the best stories in the book. Leckie is very skilled at setting up a set of constraints and exploring how this would affect the actions of various people. If a god makes a promise, how can they fulfill it? If a person commits themself to a god, how can they fulfill their obligations? I found these stories inventive and clever, taking a basic concept from the real world—making promises—and applying a fantastic veneer to it in order to deepen our understanding of it. But as fantastic as it is, I would argue this is just another version of what Leckie is doing in her biology stories or her parentage stories. We live in a world where rules and commitments imposed by others shape our behaviors: how do we navigate that ethically? what kind of promises do we make under those constraints?

(There are other themes we could identify, too, which won't be very surprising to readers of her novels, particularly an interest in empire and issues of translation.)

There are a number of strong stories here, of course, but the real strength of this book is the deeper understanding I now feel like I have of one of my favorite sf&f writers working today. It took almost twenty years for Leckie to amass enough short fiction to fill a single volume, so I guess I won't look out for a second collection until the 2040s, but until then, I'll continue to enjoy her novels.

06 May 2025

Hugos 2025: Star Trek: Warp Your Own Way by Ryan North and Chris Fenoglio

Star Trek: Lower Decks: Warp Your Own Way

Published: 2024
Acquired: December 2024
Read: April 2025
Written by Ryan North
Art by Chris Fenoglio
Colors by Charlie Kirchoff
Letters by Jeff Eckleberry

I received this book as a Christmas gift from my wife and kids, but was given a bump to actually read it when it was selected as a finalist for the Hugo Award for Best Graphic Story—the first Hugo finalist I'll be writing up on this blog. It's a choose-your-own-adventure-style comic book set in the world of Star Trek: Lower Decks, where you play as Ensign Beckett Mariner. (This makes it the first Star Trek tie-in to be a Hugo finalist; I really must update my Star Trek at the Hugos post.) Writer Ryan North is the perfect man for this project, as both a longtime comics writer who knows how to work within constraining forms and wrote a choose-your-own-adventure version of Hamlet.

It's very cleverly done, much more cleverly than it needs to be, to be honest. I'm going to spoil the whole thing here, so if that bothers you, don't read the rest of this post.

The book begins with you waking up; you can elect to bother Tendi and Rutherford in Engineering, Boimler who's off-duty, or your mom on the bridge. Depending on what you do, different bad things happen: a Borg attack, a tribble infestation, and so on. I ended up in the various paths around the Borg attack initially, and quickly came to realize they all ended with everyone dying... except that if you had only known the Cerritos's prefix code, you could have (for some reason) saved the ship. Eventually I went down one path where there were a pair of voices talking after you died about obtaining the prefix code, and about how you only ever went for a very limited range of choices.

Eventually, I exhausted all the paths, but skimming through it, I could see there was a lot of the book I hadn't gained access to yet. I started just flipping through, and eventually I found a page where instead of being able to pick between coffee and raktajino for breakfast (which is how the book begins), you were also able to pick tea. With a little bit of detective work, I was able to figure out how you ought to be able to get there" the mysterious voices say at one point that they can't introduce new choices but it is possible to add existing choices. If you add together the coffee page number with the raktajino page number, you get to the tea page—and that unlocks a whole new network of choices.

What you start to figure out is this is all a holodeck simulation, explaining why different bad things happen if you make different choices. There's Star Trek explanations for the whole structure and format of the book, justifying the form in terms of the content. It's very cleverly done! You as the reader also begin to participate in book, talking to Mariner about what she's doing and why. You have to help Mariner figure out a way out of this situation, which begins to turn even more grim than you might have imagined. There's another bit where you have to do math to make a jump from one part of the book to another, this one cleverly done, where on one bad ending, Mariner gives you half of a math problem, and you have to play out another bad ending to get the other half of the math problem, so that you can put both those things together and finally get to a path that allows you to play out a good ending.

So yeah, it's put together incredibly well (see my diagram of it on the right), using Star Trek tropes to explain a lot of choose-your-own-adventure tropes, and pushing the form into interesting, unusual directions. The ending is even kind of moving, as you save the Cerritos, but the crew of the ship don't really understand what actually happened. This was my first Best Graphic Story finalist, and I wouldn't have guessed it going in, but upon finishing it, it immediately felt like the one to beat!

I do have one very pedantic complaint: for a book where page numbers are essential, they are printed annoyingly small! It's harder than it needs to be to flip through this book, and you need to flip through it a lot.

11 March 2025

Charles Dickens's Dombey and Son, Nos. XVII–XIX (Chs. 52-62)

I'm afraid my Dombey and Son project got away from me in February, both in the sense that I didn't get very much of it read, and it in the sense that I stopped writing up each installment immediately after reading it, so I can't do my usual thing of reacting to each installment on its own.

Dombey and Son by Charles Dickens

Originally published: 1846-48
Acquired: December 2024
Installments read: February–March 2025

Perhaps it was my otherwise distracted state, perhaps it was the book, but I found that it more fizzled out than climaxed. The last three installments have depressingly little of Florence and her emotional states; once she (inevitably) gets engaged to Walter, she basically fades out as a focal character. There's even little of Dombey himself. He and Florence reconcile, I guess, but it felt to me like this was mostly something we heard about secondhand rather than experiences. There's some good stuff with Dombey's wife, at least, which was probably the highlight of these last three installments.

I am a woman... who from her childhood has been shamed and steeled. I have been offered and rejected, put up and appraised, until my very soul has sickened. I have not had an accomplishment or grace that might have been a resource to me, but it has been paraded and vended to enhance my value, as if the common crier had called it through the streets. My poor, proud friends, have looked on and approved; and every tie between us has been deadened in my breast. There is not one of them for whom I care, as I could care for a pet-dog. I stand alone in the world, remembering well what a hollow world it has been to me, and what a hollow part of it I have been myself. (823)
I never particularly enjoyed Mr Carker as a villain, and found the way he was eliminated kind of disappointing. Thinking about it, though, I'm not sure Dickens's villains have ever really worked for me, even the ones other people seem to be really into (e.g., Uriah Heep). 

Overall, I enjoyed the earlier installments of Dombey but it lost me the more it went on... but of course, if you've ever seen a modern streaming show, you'll know that's a thing that happens all the time in serialized fiction!

This is the final in a series of posts about Dombey and Son. Previous installments are listed below:

  1. Nos. I–IV (chs. 1-13)
  2. Nos. V–VII (chs. 14-22)
  3. Nos. VIII–X (chs. 23-31)
  4. Nos. XI–XII (chs. 32-38)
  5. Nos. XIII–XIV (chs. 39-45)
  6. Nos. XV–XVI (chs. 46-51)

My winter 2025/26 Dickens novel will be The Mystery of Edwin Drood.

06 February 2025

Charles Dickens's Dombey and Son, Nos. XV–XVI (Chs. 46-51)

No. XV (chs. 46-48)
She did not sink down at his feet; she did not shut out the sight of him with her trembling hands; she did not weep; she did not utter one word of reproach. But she looked at him, and a cry of desolation issued from her heart. For as she looked, she saw him murdering that fond idea to which she had held in spite of him. She saw his cruelty, neglect, and hatred dominant above it, and stamping it down. She saw she had no father upon earth, and ran out, orphaned, from his house. (721)

Not much to say about this one... except that I called it! Precisely at the three-quarters mark, Dickens gives us our next big moment in the story, the total collapse of good feeling between Dombey and his wife, which leads to Dombey striking Florence, and Florence fleeing his house into the refuge of Captain Cuttle. Cracking stuff: any Dickens novel can have its languid moments, but he knows how to twist a knife like few others.

Dombey and Son by Charles Dickens

Originally published: 1846-48
Acquired: December 2024
Installments read: January–February 2025

It's interesting how deliberately structured and plotted Dombey and Son is, because this was very much not the case with Dickens's previous novel, Martin Chuzzlewit (1843-44, which I suffered through last winter). Indeed, I don't think it's the case with any previous Dickens novel. Maybe Oliver Twist? I don't remember that one well. But it certainly wasn't true for Pickwick Papers (1836-37), or Nicholas Nickleby (1838-39), or The Old Curiosity Shop (1840-41). The only other early Dickens novel I haven't read yet is Barnaby Rudge (1841); I guess I'll see how structured that one is... but I kind of doubt it's highly structured given what I know of it.

I wonder what happened in 1846 that turned Dickens toward plotting things out in more detail and pacing more deliberately... perhaps he suffered through Martin Chuzzlewit as much as I did and wasn't keen to repeat the experience! The introduction and notes to my Penguin Classics edition don't mention anything about this as far as I noticed, but they do recommend reading the 1974 Clarendon edition of the novel for an account of its composition. I will put in an interlibrary loan request for it.

No. XVI (chs. 49-51)
'Hope. It's that as animates you. Hope is a buoy... but Lord, my lad, like any other buoy, it only floats; it can't be steered nowhere.' (757)

Well, guess what... Walter is alive! Given this seemed quite obvious from the moment his body failed to turn up, it's a little annoying that Dickens dragged this out for five whole installments. It's like the guy hasn't been on the show a whole season!

But anyway, decent stuff as we move into the endgame, but I particularly liked the little glimpse we get of Dombey: "Mr Dombey and the world are alone together" (781).

This is the sixth in a series of posts about Dombey and Son. The next covers installment no. xvii and beyond. Previous installments are listed below:

  1. Nos. I–IV (chs. 1-13)
  2. Nos. V–VII (chs. 14-22)
  3. Nos. VIII–X (chs. 23-31)
  4. Nos. XI–XII (chs. 32-38)
  5. Nos. XIII–XIV (chs. 39-45)

28 January 2025

Charles Dickens's Dombey and Son, Nos. XIII–XIV (Chs. 39-45)

No. XIII (chs. 39-41)
Towards his first wife, Mr Dombey, in his cold and lofty arrogance, had borne himself like the removed Being he almost conceived himself to be. He had been 'Mr Dombey' with her when she first saw him, and he was 'Mr Dombey' when she died. He had asserted his greatness during their whole married life, and she had meekly recognised it. He had kept his distant seat of state on the top of his throne, and she her humble station on its lowest step; and much good it had done him, so to live in solitary bondage to his one idea. He had imagined that the proud character of his second wife would have been added to his own—would have merged into it, and exalted his greatness. He had pictured himself haughtier than ever, with Edith’s haughtiness subservient to his. He had never entertained the possibility of its arraying itself against him. (608-9)

Dombey and Son by Charles Dickens

Originally published: 1846-48
Acquired: December 2024
Installments read: January 2025

Not much to report about this one, which continues the depiction of the slow deterioration of the Dombey marriage—see above. Also some good but sad stuff about Florence. The new Mrs Dombey's mother dies.

No. XIV (chs. 42-45)
'Does that bold-faced slut... intend to take her warning, or does she not?' (669)

Another one that I found a bit slow and a bit plodding. More Florence, please! I mean, Dombey is thrown from his horse and injured and all, but there's a bit too much Carker. I get that he's up to no good, but I find something about Dickens's underhanded villains who spend a lot of time "on screen" a bit dull; I mean, he's not as bad as Pecksniff from Martin Chuzzlewit, but I feel like less would be more with this guy, but instead we just get more. Which is not more.

That said, at times, he's chillingly effective. When Dombey is injured, Carker brings a message from him to Edith (only I am suspicious that the message probably does not represent Dombey's actual intentions), trying to drive a wedge between Edith and Florence:

'His instructions were,' he said, in a low voice, 'that I should inform you that your demeanour towards Miss Dombey is not agreeable to him. That it suggests comparisons to him which are not favourable to himself. That he desires it may be wholly changed; and that if you are in earnest, he is confident it will be; for your continued show of affection will not benefit its object.'
     'That is a threat,' she said.
     'That is a threat,' he answered, in his voiceless manner of assent: adding aloud, 'but not directed against you.' (683)

I've been reading this book a solid month now, you know, and though my reading has slowed a little of late, I'm almost at the three-quarters mark, so I ought to finish it up in February.

I'm worried about that three-quarters mark, though; so far, Dickens has made the worst things happen at the ends of installment nos. v and x. What will no. xv bring?

This is the fifth in a series of posts about Dombey and Son. The next covers installment no. xv and beyond. Previous installments are listed below:

  1. Nos. I–IV (chs. 1-13)
  2. Nos. V–VII (chs. 14-22)
  3. Nos. VIII–X (chs. 23-31)
  4. Nos. XI–XII (chs. 32-38)

21 January 2025

Charles Dickens's Dombey and Son, Nos. XI–XII (Chs. 32-38)

No. XI (chs. 32-34)
It’s entered on the ship’s log, and that’s the truest book as a man can write. (505)

As I had kind of predicted, after a heavy emphasis on Florence and Dombey in the previous installment, we totally stay away from the two of them here. The first chapter is about Captain Cuttle finding out that Walter's ship was destroyed at sea with no survivors. (My prediction, though: in the absence of a body, assume he will turn up alive in a later installment nonetheless.) Dickens does a great job with Cuttle's grief:

Because it ain’t one loss, but a round dozen. Where’s that there young schoolboy with the rosy face and curly hair, that used to be as merry in this here parlour, come round every week, as a piece of music? Gone down with Wal’r. Where’s that there fresh lad, that nothing couldn’t tire nor put out, and that sparkled up and blushed so, when we joked him about Heart’s Delight, that he was beautiful to look at? Gone down with Wal’r. Where’s that there man’s spirit, all afire, that wouldn’t see the old man hove down for a minute, and cared nothing for itself? Gone down with Wal’r. It ain’t one Wal’r. There was a dozen Wal’rs that I know’d and loved, all holding round his neck when he went down, and they’re a-holding round mine now! (505)

People claim that we didn't get the idea of a multiplicity of selves until modernism, but Charles Dickens has got it here!

Dombey and Son by Charles Dickens

Originally published: 1846-48
Acquired: December 2024
Installments read: January 2025

This chapter, and the other two, continue the growing recognition of the villainy of Mr Carker. Mr Carker reacts coldly to Captain Cuttle's announcement of Walter's death, throwing him out of the firm. The next couple are honestly a bit confusing at first, because over halfway through this book, Dickens is apparrently still introducing new key characters! I thought at first they were from earlier chapters and I'd forgot them, but no. I guess if you think of each quarter of the novel as a "season" of a television show (which seems a pretty good analogy, pacing-wise), it makes sense to introduce some new regular cast members at the beginning of season three. 

Anyway, the new character here is Harriet, the sister of the two Carker brothers; in this chapter, she has a conversation with a mysterious man about John, the disgraced one; there are also hints that Mr Carker is up to something as regards Edith, Dombey's new wife. Harriet then dispenses some assistance to a homeless woman.

Then, in the next chapter, we learn more about the homeless woman, another new character, named Alice—but like Harriet, related to a preexisting character, Good Mrs Brown, the street woman who way back in installment no. iii took advantage of Florence. Alice is Mrs Brown's daughter, recently returned from transportation to Australia. Here, we learn that 1) Good Mrs Brown has been keeping tabs on the Dombeys ever since then, and 2) they both have some reason to hate Mr Carker. Upon Alice realizing it was Carker who helped her, she and her mother actually go back to Harriet's house and return the assistance she got. Wow! How all this is going to weave together, but provided I can keep track of it all, I am interested to find out.

No. XII (chs. 35-38)
'Polly, my gal,' said Mr Toodle, with a young Toodle on each knee, and two more making tea for him, and plenty more scattered about – Mr Toodle was never out of children, but always kept a good supply on hand. (580)

Unlike most installments of Dombey and Son, this one has four chapters instead of three—I assume of somewhat shorter length, since I think all the installments are equally long. The first one here is the real standout, chronicling the return of Dombey and the new Mrs Dombey, Edith, from their honeymoon:

'And how my dearest Dombey did you find that delightfullest of cities, Paris?' she [Mrs Skewton, his mother-in-law] asked, subduing her emotion.
     'It was cold,' returned Mr Dombey.
     'Gay as ever,' said Mrs Skewton, 'of course.'
     'Not particularly. I thought it dull.' (543)

There's a really beautiful, but sad, and powerfully written, scene as Dombey almost finds himself showing affection toward Florence. But then he realizes that the only time that Edith demonstrates any affection toward anyone is when she sees Florence; indeed, Edith is a totally different person in the presence of Florence. What exactly Edith is up to, we don't know, but it's clear the one person she has genuine affection toward is not even her own mother, but Florence. Dombey is still, so still that Florence and Edith take him to be asleep in his chair, and so he observes them in secret, discovering a different side to the two of them that he never gets to see under normal circumstances.

The motto of the book, its indictment of Dombey, might be best expressed through this exchange in chapter 35:

[Dombey:] 'I directed that no expense should be spared; and all that money could do, has been done, I believe.'
     'And what can it not do, dear Dombey?' observed Cleopatra.
     'It is powerful, Madam.' (544)

Obviously the trajectory of this novel is going to be Dombey learning that there are things more powerful than money... but at what cost is this knowledge going to come? For me, the most heartrending passage in this chapter was this exchange between a couple of Dombey's servants: "Cook leads a sigh then, and a murmur of 'Ah, it’s a strange world, – it is indeed!' and when it has gone round the table, adds persuasively, 'but Miss Florence can’t well be the worse for any change, Tom.' Mr Towlinson’s rejoinder, pregnant with frightful meaning, is 'Oh, can’t she though!'" (542). It does seem quite probable to me that things are going to get worse for Florence before they get better; you can feel the tension rising through this chapter most excruciatingly. Poor Florence.

The other chapters here are less captivating but still important, showing the continuing deterioration (is that the right word? you can't deteriorate a thing that was never constructed to begin with) the Dombeys' new marriage, and the continuing negative influence of Carker.

Back in the opening quarter of the book, with Paul's schooling, there was a lot of Dickens's usual invective against bad systems of education; with Paul dead, we can't really get that, but there's still a little of it here, through the character of Rob, who is sent to a badly run charity school for the lower classes:

they never taught honour at the Grinders’ School, where the system that prevailed was particularly strong in the engendering of hypocrisy. Insomuch, that many of the friends and masters of past Grinders said, if this were what came of education for the common people, let us have none. Some more rational said, let us have a better one. But the governing powers of the Grinders’ Company were always ready for them, by picking out a few boys who had turned out well in spite of the system, and roundly asserting that they could have only turned out well because of it. Which settled the business of those objectors out of hand, and established the glory of the Grinders’ Institution. (588-89)

This is the fourth in a series of posts about Dombey and Son. The next covers installment no. xiii and beyond. Previous installments are listed below:

  1. Nos. I–IV (chs. 1-13)
  2. Nos. V–VII (chs. 14-22)
  3. Nos. VIII–X (chs. 23-31)

14 January 2025

Charles Dickens's Dombey and Son, Nos. VIII–X (Chs. 23-31)

No. VIII (Chs. 23-25)
Sir Barnet and Lady Skettles, very good people, resided in a pretty villa at Fulham, on the banks of the Thames; which was one of the most desirable residences in the world when a rowing-match happened to be going past, but had its little inconveniences at other times, among which may be enumerated the occasional appearance of the river in the drawing-room, and the contemporaneous disappearance of the lawn and shrubbery. (375)

I feel like Dombey and Son is drifting a bit in this installment, languishing. It's not bad... but I'm also still not quite clear where the novel is going following from the death of Paul Dombey. In these chapters, we follow Florence mostly, with a bit also about Uncle Sol and Captain Cuttle. Probably this is all going somewhere... but where?

Dombey and Son by Charles Dickens

Originally published: 1846-48
Acquired: December 2024
Installments read: January 2025

If the novel has a main point, though, it's clearly Florence's emotional deprivation. In this installment, Florence overhears the aunt of an orphan talking to her charge about Florence: "your misfortune is a lighter one than Florence’s; for not an orphan in the wide world can be so deserted as the child who is an outcast from a living parent’s love" (381). There are a lot of emotionally deprived orphans (or seeming orphans, e.g., Great Expectations) in Dickens, but (perhaps I'm forgetting something) I can't think of any nonorphans so deprived as Florence. How bad is it to have a parent who doesn't love you, doesn't even hate you, just doesn't think of you at all? All the stuff about Florence is sort of quietly devastating, and for me anyway, she's emerging as one of Dickens's best female characters. 

I'm not really sure where this is all going to go, but I continue to mostly enjoy the journey.

No. IX (chs. 26-28)
Am I hitting some kind of mid-book slump? Again, an installment I was mostly pretty "meh" on—except for the stuff about Florence, of course, who I continue to have great empathy for. I think the problem is when there's too much stuff about Dombey himself (and his social circle). But all that does lead somewhere in this one, which is... Dombey is getting remarried! What implications will this have for Florence, who doesn't even get to meet her new mother prior to the engagement? I would say it can't make her life worse, but there's over half the novel to go, so it probably will.

What is up with Mr Carker? I don't trust that guy. You might object to a key character only emerging halfway through a novel, but I guess that's serialization for you. Indeed, I like the way he's slowly emerging as a figure of significance. (Douglas Adams does something similar with a minor character in the Doctor Who serial The Pirate Planet.) ((I am willing to bet no one has ever compared these two texts before.))

No. X (chs. 29-31)
Say what you will about our man Charles Dickens, but he knows how to pace a serial. Dombey and Son consists of nineteen parts, but the last is double-length (a two-part finale), so the end of installment no. x is the exact midpoint of the novel. At the end of the first quarter, Paul Dombey died; at the end of the second quarter, Mr Dombey gets remarried.

But poor Florence! What is going to happen to her? Dombey's new in-laws are clearly up to something (I am a bit worried I should know what this is but that I glazed over it when I was bored in a previous installment, but I'm sure I'll figure it out), and Dombey's new wife clearly has regrets about it... but is willing to go forward with the plan anyway.

This installment basically totally revolves around the lead-up to the wedding. It has been a while, actually, since we have checked in on some of the side characters. Soon, I am guessing? But in the meantime, I continue to be very into the trajectory of Florence, surely one of Dickens's most put-upon female characters!

This is the third in a series of posts about Dombey and Son. The next covers installment no. xi and beyond. Previous installments are listed below:

  1. Nos. I–IV (chs. 1-13)
  2. Nos. V–VII (chs. 14-22)

07 January 2025

Charles Dickens's Dombey and Son, No. V–VII (Chs. 14-22)

No. V (Chs. 14-16)
This deviates from the structure of the last couple installments. Instead of going Paul→Paul→someone else (probably Walter), here we get Paul→someone else (indeed, Walter)→Paul. In the first chapter, Paul and Florence attend an end-of-term party for the students at Paul's school, but Paul suffers an attack of illness. The whole chapter has a kind of dreamlike quality, and though the installment came out in February, and the party actually precedes summer break, it actually felt very appropriate to read it in December; tonally, it felt very appropriate for Christmas, with its nostalgic, wistful tone.

Dombey and Son by Charles Dickens

Originally published: 1846-48
Acquired: December 2024
Installments read: December 2024–January 2025

There's also some good jokes about an eternal Dickens bugaboo, the oversystematization of that which should not be systematized. In this case, there's a funny bit about how the teachers at Paul's school rate him at 6¾ on a scale of one to eight for "natural capacity" and "general disposition to study"... though only at a four for "gentlemanly demeanour" (208). Paul, however, is "undecided whether six three-fourths, meant six pounds fifteen, or sixpence three farthings, or six foot three, or three quarters past six, or six somethings that he hadn’t learnt yet, with three unknown something elses over"!

Incidentally, when sick, Paul perceives things around them changing size and position; it seemed to me that this could be (based on my limited understanding) an example of a malady named after a different Victorian novel, Alice in Wonderland syndrome, but in some quick Googling, anyway, I didn't find anyone else making that connection to Dombey and Son. Maybe I don't understand AIWS, or maybe I misread the novel? For example, it's noted that "Mr Toots’s head had the appearance of being at once bigger and farther off than was quite natural" (213). It's very vivid, though, making me wonder if Dickens himself suffered from it at some point.

The Walter bit goes on a bit too long, like all the other ones, but we do see that Walter is beginning to invest himself emotionally in Florence. Florence, incidentally, is probably the Dickens girlest Dickens girl who ever Dickens girled, being a beautiful naïve slip of a girl who the men adore. The statement that she was "something precious, unattainable, unchangeable, and indefinite – indefinite in all but its power of giving him pleasure, and restraining him like an angel’s hand from anything unworthy" (243) could sum up so many of Dickens's female characters.

The big spoiler for this section—which I did not know going in, so avert your eyes if you want that to be true of you as well—is that the "Son" of Dombey and Son is no more following this section. That's right, Paul dies one-quarter of the way into the novel of which he is one-half of the title!

I did not see this turn of events, partially for that reason, and partially because it seemed like we were in for a very typical Dickens formula: the bildungsroman about a boy with an emotionally deprived childhood, e.g., Nicholas Nickleby (1838-39), David Copperfield (1849-50), Great Expectations (1860-61). I would say it's clever of Dickens to subvert your expectations that way... except that two of those examples postdate this novel, so it wasn't a formula yet! But anyway, it's a very effective piece of writing either way, Dickens at his sentimental best. He would bring himself to tears reading the chapter aloud at public performances, apparently; I would have loved to see and hear such a thing.

No. VI (Chs. 17-19)
'Wal'r,' said the Captain, handing it [the watch] over, and shaking him heartily by the hand, 'a parting gift, my lad. Put it back half an hour every morning, and about another quarter towards the afternoon, and it’s a watch that’ll do you credit.' (300)

The first and third chapters here are about Captain Cuttle and Walter respectively, and they're fine for what they are. (Is Captain Cuttle the character my friend said I'd like?) But the clear standout here is the middle chapter, "Father and Daughter," about how Florence is mourning the death of her brother Paul and how her father just doesn't care for her or her feelings in any way, shape, or form.

I occasionally have remarked that I want to have more access to Florence's interiority, but I think I'm just projecting my twenty-first-century expectations onto this novel. Dickens wasn't a realist, like those Victorian writers that came after him, such as George Eliot or Elizabeth Gaskell, his project wasn't to reveal character by taking you into someone's head. Dickens reveals character through dialogue and action. In the realist novel, you have this artifice, that the narrator somehow knows what Hetty Sorell or Molly Gibson were thinking. Dickens projects no such artifice—well, he projects a different one. His narrators never claim to know what someone is thinking, only what someone is saying and doing. Imagine someone else telling you the story of Florence Dombey because it was real; they wouldn't give you her thoughts via free indirect discourse or something because they don't know them. But what they could tell was what she did, how she looked out at the happy family across the street every day, and that would be enough to let you know how she felt, because that's how humans always figure out how each other feel. You need to imagine a Dickens novel is being related to you by a friend who knows the story in detail.

So of course we don't have access to Florence's interiority, and you should stop hoping for it! Dickens does a great job of communicating what's going on inside her regardless, particularly in that devastating scene where Florence goes to see her father.

I don't think this is an absolute; clearly we do get a bit of Paul's interiority in his last couple chapters, as he's dying. But it's not a move Dickens makes a lot, and he only deploys it to make a particularly strong point. His next novel after Dombey and Son would be David Copperfield, which is (I believe) his first told in the first person, so we finally do get that dose of interiority... but the old-fashioned way. He would use it in just two other novels, both ones I rank among his best, Great Expectations and Bleak House (1852-53).

No. VII (Chs. 20-22)
'You are too great a man, Dombey, to be thoughtful. In your position, Sir, you’re far above that kind of thing.' (314)

This is probably the first installment of Dombey and Son that I found ho-hum. It had its moments, but none of the three chapters was a great one. In the first, Dombey hangs out with a new character, Major Joe Bagstock—he's who I've quoted above, and he is in general quite funny. In the second, Dombey and Bagstock go on a trip and bump into Mrs Richards, who reveals her eldest son (whose education Dombey sponsored) has gone bad. In the third, said son shows up at Dombey and Son looking for a job so he can straighten himself out, and doesn't get one directly, but Dombey's clerk gets him a placement with Walter's uncle, the instument-maker. (Walter himself is missing, his ship unheard of since its departure.)

It's all fine, and definitely there are some great bits, but it felt to me like things were being moved into position for the next phase of the story—whatever that may be.

This is the second in a series of posts about Dombey and Son. The next covers installment no. viii and beyond. Previous installments are listed below:

  1. Nos. I–IV (chs. 1-13)

31 December 2024

Charles Dickens's Dombey and Son, Nos. I–IV (Chs. 1-13)

Every winter break, I read the most popular Charles Dickens novel that I haven't previously read. This year, that brings me to Dombey and Son, originally serialized in nineteen monthly parts from October 1846 to April 1848 under the title of Dealings with with the Firm Dombey and Son, Wholesale, Retail and for Exportation. Last year, I experimented with reading Martin Chuzzlewit (1843-44) serially. Not across nineteen months(!), but rather alternating installments of the novel with parts of other books (or, in some cases, whole other books), and then writing up those installments as I went. I would say it was a successful experiment, in that instead of being forced to endure nothing but Martin Chuzzlewit for weeks, I got to alternate it with book that were actually good, so I decided to go for it again this year.

Dombey and Son by Charles Dickens

Originally published: 1846-48
Acquired: December 2024
Installments read: December 2024

I should say, that going in, I literally knew nothing at all about this book, beyond what I gleaned from the introduction to my Penguin Classics edition. I feel like I've never heard anyone ever mention it, even in passing. A totally forgotten (or forgettable) Dickens novel? It doesn't bode well, to be honest, beginning a book that's nine hundred pages long and not even worth complaining about, but I tried to be open-minded.

No. I (Chs. 1-4)
Some Dickens novels begin ominously, a mode that Dickens excels in. Think of A Tale of Two Cities (1859) or Great Expectations (1860-61). But it seems to me that earlier in his career, perhaps because his big success was still the hijinks of The Pickwick Papers (1836-37), Dickens was much more likely to begin comically, even when his topic was tragic. He takes a similar mode here to that of David Copperfield (1849-50), beginning with the birth of a child, largely under sad circumstances, but mostly focusing on making jokes about it all. The first line is so funny I stopped immediately to read it aloud to my wife: "Dombey sat in the corner of the darkened room in the great arm-chair by the bedside, and Son lay tucked up warm in a little basket bedstead, carefully disposed on a low settee immediately in front of the fire and close to it, as if his constitution were analogous to that of a muffin, and it was essential to toast him brown while he was very new" (11). And then the second line is also a joke: "Dombey was about eight-and-forty years of age. Son about eight-and-forty minutes. Dombey was rather bald, rather red, and though a handsome well-made man, too stern and pompous in appearance, to be prepossessing. Son was very bald, and very red, and though (of course) an undeniably fine infant, somewhat crushed and spotty in his general effect, as yet" (11).

What this all belies is that the opening of the book is quite sad! Dombey is the owner of the titular firm; he use to be the "Son" and now he is the "Dombey," but though he has been married ten years, he has only just got a "Son." He does have a daughter, aged six... who he doesn't care about at all, because a girl "was merely a piece of base coin that couldn’t be invested – a bad Boy – nothing more" (13). Dombey's lack of affection extends to his wife, who dies after giving birth to Son, and Dombey is more concerned about the logistical difficulties this will lead to in raising his Son. And though this bit is of course sad, Dickens also has a lot of jokes here, mostly from the dead Mrs. Dombey's sister-in-law, who keeps insisting she just needs to make an effort and she'll be fine: "It’s necessary for you to make an effort, and perhaps a very great and painful effort which you are not disposed to make; but this is a world of effort you know, Fanny, and we must never yield, when so much depends upon us. Come! Try! I must really scold you if you don’t!" (20-1)

I feel like Dickens pulls you in with the jokes in order to subsequently get you with the tragedy, but also the tragedy is perhaps a bit too muted, more abstractly understood than felt, but like I said, maybe the Dickens audience of 1846 didn't want tragedy, only comedy, so he had to understate it a bit. (This is after The Old Curiosity Shop and the death of Little Nell, though, so maybe I am overstating this point.)

After this, there's some comic hijinks as Dombey must engage a wet-nurse, excellent stuff, I really enjoyed it. So many great lines about the wet-nurse and her apple-faced family. But then Dickens is always very good at this sort of thing, and from here we move away from comedy a bit, as the wet-nurse (real name: Mrs Toodle, but called Mrs Richards when at work because it's more "ordinary" and "convenient") meets the daughter of Dombey for the first time, and realizes how isolated and alone and sad the poor girl is. After all this, I was fairly into the book; a much better opening installment than Martin Chuzzlewit, to be sure.

The fourth chapter is some blather about a shopkeeper and his nephew Walter, though, so you can't win them all, though again it had a couple good jokes. But then I got to take a break and go read something else. One installment down... eighteen to go!

No. II (Chs. 5-7)
It's interesting that two of the three chapter titles here center Dombey's son Paul—"Paul's Progress and Christening" and "Paul's Second Deprivation"—because it seems to me that the clear emotional focus of the chapters is Dombey's neglected daughter, Florence. Yes, Paul's christening is the event on which these three chapters hinge, in that it's there that the characters make some key decisions that end up having major repercussions. (Mrs Richards decides to go visit her son at his new school, which results in her and a couple others losing their jobs working for the Dombeys.) But the person who goes through trauma here is Florence; on her way back from the visit, she gets separated from her caretakers, and she is taken advantage of by "Good Mrs Brown," who steals her clothes and cuts her hair off and claims she will murder Florence if Florence rats her out! Poor Florence goes through some awful stuff here.

Still, we feel a bit distanced from it all. The things we're told about are quite awful to read, but I don't feel like we're totally in Florence's interiority the way Dickens sometimes brings us, like he did a few years after this with Little Dorrit in Little Dorrit (1855-57).

I didn't expect the whole thing with Mrs Richards and the Dombeys to fall apart like that so quickly, though, so I am curious to see where this all goes in the next installment.

No. III (Chs. 8-10)
'Girls,' said Mr Dombey, 'have nothing to do with Dombey and Son.' (153)

Here we get one chapter about Paul and two about a character I haven't discussed much so far, Walter. Back in no. II, Walter helped rescue Florence after her ordeal at the hands of Good Mrs Brown; here, he comes calling to Mr Dombey to seek help paying off the debts of his uncle, a ship's instrument-maker who has no customers.

I am a bit worried that Walter may be the character about which my friend Christiana said, "I can think of one character who I expect you to like," because I find that so far his sections substantially slow the narrative down with a lot of unnecessary detail. I'm loathe to say Dickens could have done something in fewer words... but I really think "nobody is buying anything at my shop" doesn't need as many words as he gives it.

On the other hand, I found chapter 8 very interesting; we've jumped ahead a bit here, and now Paul Dombey is almost five, and we actually get some insight into his psychology. Poor kid! But I like best of all the simultaneously sympathetic and scathing way that Dickens describes Mr Dombey himself: "But he loved his son with all the love he had. If there were a warm place in his frosty heart, his son occupied it; if its very hard surface could receive the impression of any image, the image of that son was there; though not so much as an infant, or as a boy, but as a grown man – the 'Son' of the Firm. Therefore he was impatient to advance into the future, and to hurry over the intervening passages of his history" (109).

No. IV (Chs. 11-13)
She was dry and sandy with working in the graves of deceased languages. None of your live languages for Miss Blimber. They must be dead – stone deadand then Miss Blimber dug them up like a Ghoule. (163) 

We're settling into a pattern here, I think: two chapters about Paul Dombey, and then one going elsewhere. The Paul ones are about how at first he and Florence go to the seaside and spend time with a terrible governess (she's not called a governess, I don't think, but she's essentially so), and then Dombey decides Son needs an education, so he gets packed off to a nearby terrible school. What Victorian does horrible systems better than Dickens? Great stuff about the terrible, terrible education Paul is beginning to get; lots of good jokes on this and other topics. I am not loving this book yet (still a bit long-winded, we're still a bit distant from Paul and Florence, I think) but certainly I am enjoying it more than Martin Chuzzlewit or The Old Curiosity Shop; I don't know this one isn't better know. I guess Dickens has got 750 pages in which he can screw it up.

The other chapter is about the doings at the firm Dombey and Son, a place we previously haven't gone despite it being the title of the novel! Most of the characters here are thus new, but there's a bit more about Walter, who is being sent to the West Indies. I remain open-minded, I suppose, but I am not sure where this strand of the novel is going. The best part, though, is this zinger between two new characters who are estranged brothers:

'Haven’t you injured me enough already?'
     'I have never injured you, James, wilfully.'
     'You are my brother... That’s injury enough.' (200)

Dickens has a good line in insult comedy. 

This is the first in a series of posts about Dombey and Son. The next covers installment no. v and beyond.