30 September 2020

Hugos 1958: The Big Time by Fritz Leiber

Originally published: 1958
Acquired: July 2020
Read: August 2020

The Big Time by Fritz Leiber

The Big Time won the 1958 Hugo Award for Best Novel or Novelette.* Like a lot of Leiber's work, it's long out of print, though I was able to get a nice-looking 2000 Tor hardcover for cheap. The Big Time was one of the first of Leiber's "Change War" stories, about a time war being raged between factions across human history; the SF Encyclopedia doesn't credit Leiber with inventing this now-familiar sf idea, but does indicate he popularized it. It's an odd book, though. Instead of confronting the idea head on (as, say, this year's Hugo winner This Is How You Lose the Time War did), The Big Time takes place entirely in the Place, a recreation and recuperation area for Change War soldiers positioned outside of time and space; we never see the Change War even close to directly.

Instead, we see a set of Change War soldiers from different eras and ideologies, all now serving a common cause, as well as recreation staff; the first-person narrator is a woman entertainer in the Place. Two different groups of soldiers arrive in the Place at once, and things go a little haywire, mostly centering around one who was a Rupert Brooke-esque World War I poet cut down in his prime, and then recruited. There are some neat concepts here, and I liked the voice of Greta, the narrator, and I appreciate that Leiber didn't come at his Change War head on... but I'm not convinced this was the best possible story to tell about this idea, and even though it's quite short (just 128 pages in my edition), it still felt a bit too long. But there is really neat stuff here, some of it quite disturbing, and I zipped right through it, and enjoyed almost all of it. A good book, good enough that I'm going to read a collection of Leiber's Change War short fiction.

I read an old winner of the Hugo Award for Best Novel every year, plus other Hugo-related books that interest me. Next up in sequence: Changewar by Fritz Leiber

* This is the only year there was a combined award for novel and novelette. A lot about the awards fluctuated early on. If you've been following my posts about old Hugo winners, you'll note I skipped 1957, because that year the only awards were for Best American Professional Magazine, Best British Professional Magazine, and Best Fanzine. No awards for individual works at all!

28 September 2020

Review: Octopussy & The Living Daylights by Ian Fleming

Collection first published: 2002
Contents originally published: 1962-65
Acquired: June 2020
Read: August 2020

Octopussy & The Living Daylights
by Ian Fleming

This slim volume collects four James Bond short stories. Technically, it's the final Fleming James Bond book, but although the compilation first came out in 1966,* after The Man with the Golden Gun, three of the four stories here were published prior to Golden Gun, so I decided to read it first.

In his introduction to the 2006 Penguin edition, Robert Ryan suggests Fleming was a short fiction man at heart, and based on reading the Bond books, I agree; many of the novels feel padded even when they're slim. Thus Octopussy & The Living Daylights contains some of Fleming's strongest Bond work in my opinion. Bond isn't much of a factor in "Octopussy," but I enjoyed it anyway, a very thorough story of a man who plans a horrible crime and very nearly gets away with it. I was surprised to realize that the idea that Bond's ski instructor cared for him paternally after Bond's parents died wasn't an invention of the film Spectre but actually originated here. I'll be curious to see if any other elements of "Octopussy" make it into the film, or if it will be one of those Bond adaptations best characterized as "loose."

The other standout here was "The Living Daylights," where Bond has to work as a sniper in order to help an agent make it over the Berlin Wall. It's one of those stories that really gets you into Bond's psychology: he is good at killing but finds little joy in it. Or, to be honest, much else. The twist is pretty obvious, but I still enjoyed it because it's a fun one.

Of the other two, one is all right and one is for completists only. "The Property of a Lady" has some interesting ideas and backstories, but the actual story isn't really up to much. "007 in New York" isn't even a story; it's just Bond thinking about New York City while he visits it on a mission. "007 in New York" was published in the American edition of Fleming's travel book Thrilling Cities as an apology for how much Fleming hated New York City; Fleming said that Bond's take on New York was "more cheerful" than his own. But in this story's mere seven pages, Bond complains about Customs and Immigration, about how all the good hotels have closed, about how the eggs look wrong, about the shops having nothing you can't get in Europe, about how many used car lots there are, about how the restaurants have got too expensive, about the blandness of the food, about how Americans are too obsessed with hygiene, and about how there is no Reptile House at the Central Park Zoo. If that's a cheerful take on New York City, one wonders how awful Fleming must have been about it!

There's also a scrambled egg recipe in a footnote. I will try it someday.

I read a James Bond book every four months. Next up in sequence: The Man with the Golden Gun

Book Rankings (So Far):

  1. Casino Royale
  2. On Her Majesty's Secret Service
  3. Dr No
  4. Thunderball
  5. Moonraker
  6. For Your Eyes Only
  7. From Russia with Love
  8. The Spy Who Loved Me
  9. Octopussy & The Living Daylights
  10. You Only Live Twice
  11. Live and Let Die
  12. Goldfinger
  13. Diamonds are Forever

* Kind of; the 1966 edition collected just two short stories, and over the years more were added until all four were together in 2002.

25 September 2020

Little Buddy, Age Two Years and Two Months

I haven't blogged about parenting recently. I think the problem is that to do it, I feel like I need some kind of big essay topic and deep insight! Oh, how I long for the days of LiveJournal when posting that you went to the dining hall and got a sub was worthy of its own entry. So I am going to try something, a series of snapshots into Little Buddy at Age Two Years and Two Months:

  • LB doesn't tend to have big emotional reactions to books yet, as far as I've noticed, with two exceptions. One is that he hates it when anyone in a book is sleeping. "Get up get up get up!" he'll insist at the sleeping figure. I should note that a lot of the time, he picked the book, and it is something like Sleep Baby, Safe and Snug where the whole point of the book is going to bed! The other book he gets upset over is How to Bathe Your Little Dinosaur: he goes "no! no!" when the bath gets drained at the end. (Despite this, he recently has been cutting his own baths pretty short.)
  • A couple weeks ago that long-dreaded day finally arrived: he was sufficiently angry about having to go to bed that he was able to climb out of the crib. This problem was exacerbated by the fact that his bedroom door doesn't latch right, and so once out of the crib, he would get out of the room!

    Once it was clear this was not a fluke, we took the side off the crib to convert it into a "big boy bed." And I swapped out the doorknob with a different one. (Now he can get into the sewing room, though, so... not great.) At first the newfound ability to get right out of bed disrupted all his sleep training: on the monitor I could see that he would lie down peacefully, but pop up as soon as I closed the door and begin crying at the door. But after a few days of consistency, things settled down. He does still sometimes wake up in the middle of the night and demand water... even though we leave a cup of water on his nightstand so he can just grab it himself!

    We've also been struggling with him waking up very early in the morning: 4am sometimes, though wouldn't get him out of his bed until 5am. Hayley's mom group suggested some fancy timing lights-- the lights turn on at a certain time and you tell the kid they can't get out of bed until it comes on. These things cost hundred of dollars, though, so we just bought a $9 wifi-controlled smart plug from Amazon and plugged his nightlight into it. It seems to have worked? He still wakes up early sometimes, but it seems to be less frequent.

    One day this week we were startled to wake up to him crying... at 6:10! Surely the latest he has slept since March. I don't always set an alarm because we can depend on him, so this was rather later than we wanted to sleep on a day where Hayley teaches!
  • One time he bumped his knee, and pulled a band-aid magnet off the fridge and placed it on the injured spot.
  • We put him in time out when he does something he's not supposed to. I'm not sure it's super-effective, but recently he has been putting himself in time out. Like, he'll dump the cat food and then declare "time out!" before we even react. Sometimes he just says it, but sometimes he goes and shuts himself in!

    Cleverly, he sometimes uses it as a delaying tactic. Say you're trying to get him to clean up his toys; he'll scratch you and then declare "time out!" Clean-up averted! Or at least postponed.

23 September 2020

Review: The Relentless Moon by Mary Robinette Kowal

Published: 2020
Acquired: July 2020
Read: August 2020

The Relentless Moon by Mary Robinette Kowal

The third "Lady Astronaut" book takes place in parallel to the second, showing us what was happening on the lunar base at the same time Elma York was headed for Mars. This means a new narrator, Nicole Wargin, wife of the governor of Kansas; she was a minor character who I only vaguely remember from the previous books.

I found it tough to get into at first. Wargin herself I didn't find very sympathetic as a narrator, and though I think some of that might be gender bias on my part, I still wasn't enjoying the experience. I felt like her reactions to things were often off. The plot, too, took a while to become interesting; it seems as though someone is trying to sabotage the space program, but at first this is a repetitive series of dangerous incidents followed by people going, "Gosh, could there be a traitor?" But once Wargin gets into space and the polio hits the lunar colony, the book picked up steam, becoming a gripping thriller. The overall effect of the book is quite tense, and after an on-and-off start, I read it voraciously through to the end. I love space disaster stories, and this is a good one. There are also some pretty emotional beats that I did not see coming, and which really worked. The very last scene had me tearing up! And after not liking Wargin at first, I came to really understand her; Kowal does a good job of balancing all the different aspects of her psychology into a complete character.

There are two things that bothered me. One, I don't know why what Wargin did during the war was held back from the reader for so long; it felt contrived to do so. Two, I felt like it occasionally took the characters too long to think of solutions; four days of lost contact with Earth before someone looks through a telescope? But I liked this a lot, and in some ways it's more successful though I would say less ambitious than the first Lady Astronaut novel. I will probably put it on my Hugo nominating ballot.

21 September 2020

Review: The Expanse: Strange Dogs by James S.A. Corey

Published: 2017
Acquired: July 2020
Read: August 2020

Strange Dogs: An Expanse Novella
by James S.A. Corey

I think The Expanse short fiction has largely fallen into two categories: that which is kind of interesting if you already have buy-in on the characters and setting (The Butcher of Anderson Station, Drive) and that which isn't even that interesting then (Gods of Risk, The Churn). But I felt the last one, The Vital Abyss, was pretty good, and Strange Dogs is the best yet. It's the first I would say stands completely alone, in that I would recommend it as a piece of solid sf even to someone who hasn't been reading The Expanse. It's set on one of the extrasolar colonies, the one the rebel Martians fled to after Nemesis Games, and focuses on a young girl who lives there. Though she was born on Earth, it's this planet that's really her home, and unlike her parents, she doesn't mind that the Martian military won't let them return to Earth through the gate. The book follows her experience as a child on this planet, especially with the planet's strange wildlife-- the "dogs" of the title. (I thought the title was going to be a metaphor, but no, this book is literally about strange dogs.) It's really well written and well observed and very off-putting in a good way, a great slice of how children think and process grief. And if you've read all the other Expanse stories, it's even better, giving you some idea of what Admiral Duarte is like. It has sort of an open ending, and I can't decide if I want to see it pay off in one of the novels later on, or if it works just fine as is, a weird little side jaunt in this big old universe.

I read an Expanse story every eighty-ish days. Next up in sequence: Persepolis Rising

18 September 2020

Black Panther Comixology Reading Order

A couple weeks ago, comiXology had a sale on Black Panther comics: they were all reduced to $0.00. (Actually, as I write this on Tuesday the 15th, the sale is still going on.) As far as I know, this was unannounced; no press release or news item from either comiXology or Marvel, just fans noticing. People assume it must have been done in honor of the death of Chadwick Boseman, but no one has actually said!

Anyway, I "bought" them all. I don't know when I will get around to reading them, but I have already worked out my order for reading them when I do. This isn't a chronological reading order (not everything here even belongs in the same chronology; there are some movie tie-in comics, for example), but a publication one. It's not strict publication order, either, though; I don't recommend that you rotate between issues of different comics during the times there were multiple Black Panther titles. Rather, it chunks things down by story arc to make up (I hope, as I am writing this before reading any of them) a smooth reading experience. 

UPDATE ON 15 AUG. 2022: I added some titles that are available for free on Hoopla, but weren't in the sale. They are inserted in {curly brackets}.

UPDATE ON 20 NOV. 2022: I added two more titles from Hoopla following the same system as above (the last volume of Coates's run and the first of Ridley's). 

UPDATE ON 14 FEB. 2023: Added Black Panther Legends and vol. 2 of Ridley's run. 

UPDATE ON 8 AUG. 2023: Added vol. 1 of Mighty Marvel Masterworks, Wakanda, and vol. 3 of Ridley's run. 

UPDATE ON 27 DEC. 2023: Added The Crew

UPDATE ON 25 FEB. 2024: Added Marvel Super Hero Adventures and Reign at Dusk.

  • Fantastic Four vol. 1 #52 (1966)
  • Black Panther: The Sound and the Fury #1 (2018) [reprint of Fantastic Four #53 only]
  • {Mighty Marvel Masterworks: The Black Panther, Volume 1 [reprints stories from 1966-70, including both of the above]}
  • Marvel Tales: Black Panther #1 (2019) [reprints stories from 1971-73; skip the last story, a reprint from 2018] 
  • {Marvel Masterworks: The Black Panther, Volume 1 [reprints Don McGregor's first run, 1973-76]}
  • Black Panther vol. 1 #1-15 (1977-79) [Jack Kirby's run]
  • {Marvel-Verse: Black Panther [reprint of Iron Man Annual #5, 1982]}
  • Black Panther vol. 2 #1-4 (1988)
  • {Black Panther Epic Collection: Panther's Prey [collects comics from various titles, 1989-94]}
  • Black Panther vol. 3 #1-62 (1998-2003) [Christopher Priest's run]
  • {Black Panther: The Complete Collection, Volume 4 [reprint of The Crew #1-7, 2003-04]}
  • Black Panther 2099 #1 (2004)
  • Black Panther vol. 4 #1-7 (2005)
  • Wild Kingdom (2005)
    • X-Men vol. 2 #175
    • Black Panther vol. 4 #8
    • X-Men vol. 2 #176
    • Black Panther vol. 4 #9
  • {Marvel-Verse: Black Panther [reprint of Marvel Adventures: Fantastic Four #10, 2006]}
  • Black Panther vol. 4 #10-34, Annual #1, #35-41 (2006-08)
  • Black Panther vol. 5 #1-12 (2009-10)
  • Doomwar #1-6 (2010)
  • Captain America / Black Panther #1-4 (2010)
  • Klaws of the Panther #1-4 (2010-11)
  • Black Panther: The Man without Fear! #513-23 (2011)
  • Black Panther: The Most Dangerous Man Alive! #523.1, 524-29 (2011-12)
  • Black Panther vol. 6 #1-12 (2016-17) [beginning of Ta-Nehisi Coates's run]
  • Black Panther: World of Wakanda #1-6 (2017) [Roxane Gay's run]
  • Black Panther and the Crew #1-5 (2017)
  • Black Panther vol. 6 #13-18 (2017)
  • Black Panther Prelude #1-2 (2017-18) [film tie-in]
  • Black Panther vol. 1 #166-69, Annual #1, #170-72 (2017-18) [title changes to "legacy numbering"]
  • Black Panther: Long Live the King #1-6 (2018) [beginning of Nnedi Okorafor's run]
  • Black Panther: The Sound and the Fury #1 (2018) [original story]
  • Rise of the Black Panther #1-6 (2018)
  • {Marvel Super Hero Adventures: To Wakanda and Beyond [reprint of Marvel Super Hero Adventures: Spider-Man and the Stolen Vibranium #1, 2018]}
  • Wakanda Forever (2018)
    • Amazing Spider-Man: Wakanda Forever #1
    • X-Men: Wakanda Forever #1
    • Avengers: Wakanda Forever #1
  • Black Panther vol. 7 #1-6 (2018-19)
  • Shuri #1-5 (2018-19)
  • Killmonger #1-5 (2019)
  • Black Panther vol. 7 #7-12 (2019)
  • Shuri #6-10 (2019)
  • Marvel Action: Black Panther #1-6 (2019)
  • Black Panther vol. 7 #13-18 (2019-20)
  • Black Panther and the Agents of Wakanda #1-8 (2019-20)
  • Black Panther vol. 7 #19-22 (2020) 
  • {Black Panther by Ta-Nehisi Coates, Vol. 9: The Intergalactic Empire of Wakanda, Part Four [collects vol. 7 #19-25, 2020-21]}
  • {Black Panther Legends [collected miniseries from 2021-22]}
  • {Black Panther by John Ridley, Vol. 1: The Long Shadow [collects vol. 8 #1-5, 2022]}
  • {Black Panther by John Ridley, Vol. 2: Range Wars [collects vol. 8 #6-10, 2022]}
  • {Wakanda [collected miniseries from 2022-23]}
  • {Black Panther by John Ridley, Vol. 3: All This and the World, Too [collects vol. 8 #11-15, 2023]} 
  • {Black Panther, Vol. 1: Reign at Dusk [collects vol. 9 #1-5, 2023]}

16 September 2020

Review: Doctor Who: The Infinity Doctors by Lance Parkin

Originally published: 1998
Acquired: July 2010
Read: August 2020

Doctor Who: The Infinity Doctors
by Lance Parkin

This is an odd book. The Doctor seems to be the one portrayed on screen by Paul McGann, but he lives on Gallifrey; the Time Lord we would call the Master is a government official called the Magistrate, and they are friends. There are hints that would indicate it's a Doctor who's settled down after a long time traveling the universe; there are also hints that indicate the tv adventures we know didn't happen. Is it a Doctor who returned home? Or one who never left? Or one who has yet to leave?

The real pleasure of the book is in the worldbuilding. When I was a young Doctor Who fan, I was fascinated by the Time Lords; after years of mediocre Big Finish stories about them, I've come to think that killing them off was the best thing that ever happened to them, and I'd happily go a decade without going to Gallifrey or hearing about the Matrix or transduction barriers. But Lance Parkin does a great job with the Time Lords and Gallifrey, arguably better than anyone ever. The details of how the Capitol operates, the Citadel, the relationship between the Time Lords and other Gallifreyans, the details on the technologies they possess, they're all so well done. You get an amazing sense of scale and power at the same time you see how and why a Time Lord can never actually do anything: a group of people whose power is so momentous they can never make use of it. The book is chock-full of great ideas; I loved the Needle and its inhabitants; I thought the Sontarans and the Rutan have rarely been so well depicted.

On the other hand, I did kind of wonder what the point of it all was. Why tell a story about the Doctor not leaving Gallifrey? What kind of point is this book making? I'm not quite sure. It's very epic-- but on the other hand, it feels like just another adventure in a storyworld where the Doctor lives in Gallifrey. Why tell this story in that world? What is Parkin trying to say about a Doctor who lives on Gallifrey?

I'm not sure, but I do think Parkin does a great job with the (kind of) eighth Doctor. You can hear Paul McGann saying the lines. More than that, this story does a good job of maintaining the Doctor's essential Doctorishness in a non-Doctor situation. This is the kind of thing Doctor Who writers often struggle with-- on audio, when the Doctor becomes someone else, you often wouldn't even recognize them as the Doctor except for the actor playing them. But if the Doctor did live on Gallifrey and try to work within its structures, this is how he would do it. He's playful and committed to justice and clever, and improvising so much he impresses himself; he just happens to be confined to one planet.

This book originally came out in 1998, for Doctor Who's thirty-fifth anniversary (is that really a thing?), when the television show had been off the air for nearly a decade; Big Finish wasn't even making Doctor Who audio dramas yet. There's an attempt to build up a new mythology around the character. There are hints about the Doctor's secret past, about his parents, about his past loves and losses; there's old friends we've never heard of, and new lovers. In some ways it's very like what Russell T Davies and Steven Moffat would do in the revival, but in others its very different. It adds romance and myth as they did, but it can feel a little backward-looking. Twenty years later, it feels like a bit of a dead end. I think it suffers a bit from being read out of context; it's part of something building through the novels of its era, but it's been around twenty years since I read Alien Bodies or Unnatural History or The Gallifrey Chronicles! A lot of it was lost on me. (It is fun, though, to imagine the coming doom for Gallifrey that is hinted at is the Last Great Time War against the Daleks.)

The ending is a bit sudden and definitely disappointing. But up until that point, it's always enjoyable even when it's odd. Parkin has a sense of tone that many tie-in writers don't. I might sound a little down on this novel, but I'm not really. I don't entirely get what it's trying to do, and I think some of what it's trying to do is a mistake-- but what it's trying to do is big and interesting, and pulled off fairly well, and I was almost always engaged. This is a weird side-step in more than one way, but it's a great one and well worth reading.

I read an Eighth Doctor Adventure every three months. Next up in sequence: The Turing Test

14 September 2020

Review: Library of America Hainish Novels & Stories, Volume Two by Ursula K. Le Guin

Collection published: 2017
Contents originally published: 1972-2000
Acquired: January 2019
Read: August 2020

Hainish Novels & Stories, Volume Two: The Word for World Is Forest / Stories / Five Ways to Forgiveness / The Telling
by Ursula K. Le Guin

This volume collects the last of Le Guin's "second phase" Hainish works (1969-74) and then the bulk of it is taken up by the works of her third phase, when she returned to Hain after a fifteen-year absence and with a somewhat different approach (1990-2000). As with volume one, all the novels were rereads, whereas all the short fiction was new to me.

The Word for World Is Forest
I remember liking this novella enough to do a project on it in college (I don't remember exactly what it was, but I do remember it involved me writing documents and such from the world of the novella; it was for an English education class), but on reread, it's definitely the weakest of the phase two and three Hainish books. And even though it's better from a technical standpoint than any of her phase one works, I find it hard to get into. Unusually for Le Guin, there's been no real effort to create sympathetic characters. There's no attempt to make Davidson anything other than a monster even when you're in his head. He's a monster that feels real, sure, but it's exhaustive reading. But Lyubov, who I feel like should have our sympathy, is a largely pathetic figure. Davidson despises him, he despises himself, and, I would argue, the narrative itself despises him. The sections told from the perspective of the Athsheans are hard to glom onto, too. The overall effect is something that seems like it ought to be powerful, but is actually quite clinical; it always feels like you're experiencing events at a remove because no one in the book has feelings congruent to your own.

I know the book came out of a very 1970s sense of anger over Vietnam and the environment, but I think 1990s Le Guin could have done this same material much more powerfully. (And I agree with Harlan Ellison over Le Guin: The Word for World Is Forest is a much better title than Little Green Men!)

Stories
Le Guin returned to the Hainish world in 1990, but didn't write an actual novel until 2000, easing back into the universe. This volume collects all of her third-phase short fiction except for "Coming of Age in Karhide" (collected in volume one). Three of the stories make a little sequence about "churtening," a form of FTL travel being tested by the Ekumen where spaceships, objects, and people can "move" instantaneously across rooms or star systems. (It's technically not movement, the Cetians point out, because movement takes time, and churtening does not.) I liked the idea of "The Shobies' Story" and "Dancing to Ganam" more than the actuality; the premise is that churtening disrupts our experience of reality and stories help us reclaim it. In "The Shobies' Story," the characters rebuild a mutual experience through storytelling, while in "Dancing to Ganam," one character's belief in stories warps the reality he finds. But I feel like the description of the stories I've just given you works better than the actual stories Le Guin wrote. I did like "Another Story or A Fisherman of the Inland Sea," which revisits an old Le Guin theme (the person who returns home after a long relativisitc journey, as seen in Rocannon's World and "Winter's King"), but from a more upbeat angle.

A couple of the other stories are what we might call anthropological stories, where the Ekumen explicate other societies: "The Matter of Seggri" and "Solitude." This made me realize that so many Le Guin stories are told this way-- we don't learn about another society from the inside, but the outside, through the eyes of an external interlocutor (e.g., Rocannon's World, The Left Hand of Darkness, The Word for World Is Forest, the present-day chapters of The Dispossessed, some sections of Five Ways to Forgiveness, The Telling). It might be easy to dismiss this as laziness, or (more charitably) convenience: far easier to have an Ekumenical Observer use exposition to reveal a society than have it unspooled through incluing from the inside. But I don't think that's it. I think Le Guin gets that there's no such thing as a "pure" culture: all cultures are defined by their relationships with other cultures, as she highlights in The Dispossessed, when contact with offworlders gives Urras and Anarres the identity of "Cetian" for the first time. That we can discover another society from the inside is an illusion: the Ekumenical Observers stand in for us the readers,* and it would kind of be a lie to not have them. All this is to say that I enjoyed both stories, though "Matter of Seggri" was pretty tough going at times.

Finally, there are a few stories exploring gender dynamics on O, where people marry in groups of four: "Unchosen Love" and "Mountain Ways," and "Another Story" also fits into this group. They're neat-- I think like a lot of sf, you get that doubling effect. You explore a weird world, but you are also reading a metaphor for your own. I particularly liked how Le Guin explores the way in which the system doesn't work for everyone in "Unchosen Love" and (especially) "Mountain Ways." What system does?

Story Suite: Five Ways to Forgiveness
When I read this before, there were only four ways to forgiveness. The original four stories were published individually 1994-5, and then as a single volume in September 1995. Le Guin published a fifth installment in 1999, but the Library of America publication is the first time it appears with the others. I remembered really liking this book, and thinking it underrated. The Dispossessed and The Left Hand of Darkness cast a long shadow, and justly so, but they do mean that people don't really discuss the other Hainish novels a whole lot, and Five Ways to Forgiveness is the best of the others. It offers five different stories about the decolonization of the planet Yeowe. Three of them are excellent on their own ("Forgiveness Day," "A Woman's Liberation," and "Old Music and the Slave Women"), and I think "A Man of the People" is pretty good too (I do admit "Betrayals" leaves me a little cold). But like many "story suites," the whole is greater than the parts, giving us a variety of intersecting and complementing perspectives on slavery and colonization. I think a particular strength is the exploration of the "slave mentality," that many of the former slaves cannot get rid of, and also how slavery shapes the enslaver. There is some really hard reading here, especially in "A Man of the People."

"Forgiveness Day" is my favorite; Teyeo is such an excellent character, a man whose rigidity saves him and destroys him at the same time. I also really like the perspective we get on Hain itself in "A Man of the People": most of the Hainish don't care about space anymore, and spend their time leading traditional lives in small communities. The ones who do look outward are "historians": their purpose in connecting to other planets is to chronicle history, of which Hain has so much. It's an interesting way of thinking about interactions with other societies.

Women are the (co-)protagonists of three of the five stories here; I find it fascinating that it took Le Guin almost thirty years to write a Hainish book where a woman's voice dominated. What an example of internalized patriarchy!

The Telling
I know I've read this before, but I had literally no memory of it going in. And I never had a memory of it: not a single passage or incident sparked a memory of having read the book before. I don't know why, because it's quite good. It's a pretty typical late-period Le Guin Hainish story: it's very quiet and mostly about explicating a different society. But it's also tough going in her depiction of religious fundamentalism. Sutty's past life and present day collide at the end, and it's a very devastating ending after what has been a pretty gentle book. Definitely a "lesser" Hainish work... but a lesser Le Guin still towers above the work of many others! I can't believe I forgot it.

I did find it interesting the way this lined up with "Forgiveness Day": both stories feature young woman as Ekumenical Observers who are naive but don't realize how much they don't know, and their arrogance gets themselves and others into trouble; they end up in relationships with rigid men from an oppressive society. There's something vaguely misogynistic about it, actually, which I find quite weird; if it just happened once, you'd think it was just an individual, but twice feels like a commentary.

Also both The Telling and Five Ways depict situations where the oppressive society explored by the Ekumen was actually indirectly caused by the Ekumen. The Werelians in Five Ways developed spaceflight and colonized Yeowe in response to Ekumenical contact; the dictatorship in The Telling is inspired by hearing from Terra on the ansible. It's an interesting critique of a set-up that was fairly benign in Left Hand: even a well-intentioned contact between cultures will change both sides in ways we can't imagine. The Ekumen does not always make things better. (Though, both stories argue, in the long run, things will come out all right.)

* * *

Something else that stuck out to me while reading volume two is that a lot of Le Guin's phase-three Hainish work is very bildungsromanish. The Dispossessed in volume one was arguably the start of this trend, but many of the stories in phase three start in someone's childhood and track them all the way up through adulthood: "Coming of Age in Karhide" (duh!), "Another Story," "Solitude," and three of the stories in Five Ways. Probably others I'm not thinking of. This isn't true of any of the phase-one stories, I don't think. I'm not sure what to think of it, but the bildungsroman is arguably about learning how to fit into society, which has interesting correspondence with how Le Guin's sf is about discovering societies, from without and from within.

The arrangement of these volumes is largely in publication order, except that the short fiction is grouped together in a way that reads well. But I don't get why The Dispossessed (1974) was in volume one while The Word for World Is Forest (1972) is in volume two. Especially as 1) switching the 300-page Dispossessed with the 100-page Word for World would give more even page counts (volume one is over 1,000 pages, and volume two under 800), and 2) putting them the other way around would distribute the two most famous Hainish novels across two different volumes, which is surely good from a sales standpoint.

That said, the arrangement is largely academic to me, because I read the stories in pretty strict publication order, rather than the given order. I think the order here would be fine, but I did really enjoy the publication order. For example, "Vaster Than Empires and More Slow" makes sense to read in proximity to The Word for World Is Forest, as both are about ecology and colonialism, and "Coming of Age in Karhide" feels very much of a piece with the anthropological coming-of-age stories collected in volume two.

If you want to know the publication order of the Hainish cycle, I've published a page on it here.

Because I'm me, I also spent my time making notes about the internal chronology of the stories-- no easy task, because Le Guin often didn't care! But I think she cared more than she claimed to, and a coherent timeline isn't too hard to work up with a couple exceptions. When I first read the Hainish books back in 2005-7, I did it in chronological order, but extra clues from reading the short fiction (and not just the books) led me to discover that I made an error. Contra whatever timeline I consulted at the time, I think The Telling almost certainly precedes Five Ways to Forgiveness (though this is one of the areas where the details are contradictory). Anyway, full details are at the same link above if you are interested. I think there is merit in a chronological read-through for a first-time reader, in that it front-loads The Dispossessed, one of the best Hainish novels, instead of causing you to lead off with the three original novels, which are the weakest and most generic in my opinion. But the books are all so lightly linked that order rarely matters.

* Some have criticized Left Hand, for example, for the fact that Genly sexual/gender biases are so much like those of a contemporary reader, but that's the point. To an extent, Le Guin isn't really trying to imagine someone coming from a cosmopolitan future society going to a different planet, but someone from 1970s America doing so.

11 September 2020

Back to School

This is the end of my third week teaching-- my first three weeks of being in the classroom since March.

Desperate, like many colleges, to keep their doors open and thus their enrollments up, UT has pushed us all back into the classroom. Masks are mandatory, as are social distancing; the two classrooms I've been assigned to this semester each has 11 desks for students, while my course caps are 20-22.

We've been encouraged to teach the class to half the students in person, and stream it to the half that aren't present, but to me that sounds as awful as all get out. Who wants to watch a livestream of an in-person class? Who wants to be an in-person class where the professor is constantly looking at Zoom? So I've decided to have half my class in the room on Wednesday, and the other half on Friday-- but I don't stream it to the half that's not there, I just repeat the same content across the two days. I make up for this by assigning homework due at the end of the week, accounting for the "missing third day," though I encourage them to get it done for the day they don't come to class.

Then, I do a Zoom class with the entire section on Mondays. This lets me see all the students at once; it also lets me see anyone who can't come to class in person. Across my three sections, I have two students with "remote learning accommodations" (both are overseas), but in addition, the class has to allow for students who are on campus but can't/won't come to an in-person class for temporary periods. So far I have two students who have informed me of positive COVID-19 tests, a few more who have told me their roommates tested positive so they self-isolated, and one who said her and her suitemates were spooked enough by how quickly it is spreading through the student body that they voluntarily decided to isolate themselves for two weeks. (Students who can't come to class get alternate work to do, usually involving watching a video of me lecturing, in lieu of the Wednesday/Friday class.)

It's all a bit of a muddle, exacerbated by an irregular schedule for the first few weeks (we started on a Wednesday, then the third week included Labor Day, which supposedly we were supposed to make up by having class on a Saturday(!)), by the fact that every professor is handling the room caps differently (from talking to my students, most do seem to be live-streaming to non-present students), by starting a week early so that we can end by Thanksgiving (one of my students didn't know we had changed the start date of the semester until she got to campus and learned she had missed a week of class), and by the fact that every student is of course online on a different day for a different professor (one of my students has a thirty-minute commute, and has an on-line class for a different professor immediately prior to my in-person class).

The Dean sent us an e-mail complaining parents were confused (what parents think doesn't seem like something we should worry about in college, but whatever), but I don't think this is because of poor communication. Students are confused because it is confusing! If you're in your first semester (as most of my students are), college is already confusing; imagine adding "hybrid" courses on top of all that.

I think it's going to be hard to build rapport. I don't get to see more than ten students at a time; some days just five depending on how groups break down and who is absent. Classes that small are always tricky in a gen ed, as it's hard to create a critical mass of invested students whose investment spreads to the others; if you have three or four apathetic or even just quiet students, that could be over half the room! I only get to see any given student in person for about an hour a week... and they have a mask on, stymieing my already mediocre name-learning ability. (We are required to make seating charts for contact tracing, though, so that turned out to have an unexpected upside.)

Because of scheduling, I've only taught one Zoom class so far, but to my surprised it was kind of better than the in-person class. I had twenty students, so there was a good critical mass, and enough of them were engaged enough to keep it going. (I did not have to talk to twenty black screens, thank God.) Plus, you can do group work and circulate on Zoom... which thanks to social distancing, I can't do in person!

It's going to be an odd semester. I am almost certainly going to screw it up. Or rather, I already have.

Will we make it through? My university's COVID dashboard puts us at 24 total cases by the end of week two, but my suspicion is a lot of positive tests came in over this weekend that will show a big jump when it is updated later today. Every weekend we get a global e-mail from the Dean of Students reminding students of the harsh consequences for hosting or attending a party. I am not sure how many of my students take it seriously, but even if it's just 10% who don't, that's only two in each of my classes... but over 800 overall, which seems more than enough to generate and spread a critical mass of COVID infections...

09 September 2020

Review: Avatar: The Last Airbender: Team Avatar Tales by Gene Luen Yang et al.

Collection published: 2019
Contents originally published: 2013-19
Read: August 2020

Avatar: The Last Airbender: Team Avatar Tales

Written by Gene Luen Yang, Dave Scheidt, Ron Koertge, Sara Goetter, Kiki Hughes
Illustrated by
Ryan Hill, Little Corvus, Faith Erin Hicks, Gene Luen Yang, Sara Goetter, Kiki Hughes, Carla Speed McNeill, Coni Yovaniniz

Colored by
Cris Peter, Lark Pien, Natalie Riess, Jenn Manley Lee

Lettered by
Michael Heisler, Little Corvus, Gene Luen Yang, Sara Goetter, Kiki Hughes, Cona Yovaniniz

This thin volume (just 70 pages!) collects a pretty random bunch of short Avatar stories, similar to The Lost Adventures; these are a mix of republished Free Comic Book Day stories and new short shorts. As always, they're fun stuff. The three post-tv show stories written by Gene Luen Yang are good, of course; my favorite is "Shells" (illustrated by Faith Erin Hicks, now the writer of the ongoing Avatar comic), where Sokka watches as Suki lays the smackdown on a gatekeeping misogynist shell store proprietor. The fun of the book, though, is in the short pieces, mostly set during the tv show, just wacky little adventures that remind you why you like these characters and this premise. Of course I enjoyed "The Substitute" (written by Dave Scheidt, illustrated by Little Corvus) where Sokka accidentally becomes a schoolteacher while in pursuit of snacks, but the tale of Toph's arena days in "Toph and The Boulder" (written and illustrated by Sara Goettner) was also great, as Toph helps one of her rivals figure out what's wrong with his vet-fearing cat. "Origami" (written and illustrated by Kiki Hughes) is less humorous, but more heartfelt, as Team Avatar are reminded what they're fighting for.

All that plus a poem by Sokka! (written by Ron Koertge, illustrated by Yang) It probably took me thirty minutes to read it. I had a blast.

07 September 2020

Review: The Expanse: Babylon's Ashes by James S.A. Corey

Originally published: 2016
Acquired: May 2020
Read: August 2020

Babylon's Ashes: Book Six of The Expanse
by James S.A. Corey

One thing I like about The Expanse is the way it structures each individual novel, and the way it plays with those structures. Book one had two alternating narrators; books two through five had four, though it didn't move through them in a strict rotation, instead bouncing back and forth as needed. (Plus each book has additional narrators for the prologue and epilogue.) Book six initially seems like it's going to have six: we're introduced to four narrators in turn, then we cycle back to the first, then to the second. But then a fifth is added, then a sixth. All in all, Babylon's Ashes features sixteen narrators, though some just for a chapter or two.

I wasn't sure what I thought about this. It definitely gives a wider perspective on events; some of the earlier novels, I think, struggled to place the events in the broader political and cultural context of the solar system. It's also nice to check in with characters such as Prax, who I suspect we will have no reason to hear from again. But it also prevents the book from obtaining a thematic unity because the character arcs that I think are supposed to be important don't have enough room. I feel like there was something about Holden's increasing awareness that doing the right thing is complicated that was too subdued to be clear; similarly, I think Michio Pa's arc was meant to resonate with that, but she often seemed to vanish from the narrative, and we would only hear about things she did, instead of see them. I think I would sacrifice hearing from Prax again to make that work better. I wanted to hear more from Filip, too, though I liked how his story arc ended.

I'm curious about where this series is going. The first trilogy was very directly about the protomolecule; the middle one was more about the consequences the protomolecule has had on the wider politics of humanity. I like that idea in theory, but I also found that the all three books of the middle trilogy were weaker than all three weeks of the first trilogy. I wonder if the protomolecule will come into increased prominence again in the final trilogy, and if the series will recover the energy and depth it had in the original trilogy. Babylon's Ashes was fine, at times very good, but I feel like there's a better version of it that could have existed.

I read an Expanse story every eighty-ish days. Next up in sequence: Strange Dogs

04 September 2020

Reading Roundup Year in Review, 2019/20

The first month my reading record (now 78 pages long!) covers is September 2003, and so my "reading year" runs from September to August. In a nice bit of synchronicity it almost lines up with the academic year, as that has historically had much more impact on my life than the calendar year. (Well, it's not quite synchronicity; I think I started tracking my reading because I had moved into the dorms and needed to know what books to take with me.)


As you can see, it was my worst year ever... by some margin! Over forty books below my previous record low; just over half as many as in the previous year. I can blame a lot of things, but probably 1) parenthood, 2) the pandemic, and 3) a couple very long, very bad books are the core of it. And a lack of diligence on my part. Too much wasting time on my phone when I could be wasting time reading a book!

Here's how my reading this year broke down by category: (I typically only break out a series or author if I read more than one in the past year)

SERIES/GENRE/AUTHOR # OF BOOKS BOOKS/ MONTH % OF ALL BOOKS
Star Trek1 3
0.3
3.8%
Doctor Who1 12 1.0 15.2%
Media Tie-In Subtotal 15 1.3
19.0%




Discworld 6 0.5 7.6%
The Expanse 4
0.3 5.1%
Ursula K. Le Guin 2
0.2 2.5%
Other SF&F 25 2.1 31.6%
General SF&F Subtotal 37 3.1 46.8%




DC Universe Comics4
0.35.1%
Other Comics 8
0.7 10.1%
Comics Subtotal 12
1.0 15.2%




James Bond by Ian Fleming 2
0.2 2.5%
Victorian Literature 2
0.2 2.5%
Other Literature 4
0.3 5.1%
General Literature Subtotal 8
0.7
10.1%




Nonfiction Subtotal
7
0.6 8.9%


1. Comic books in series that are predominantly not comics I don't count under my "Comics" category, but under the series's main designation.

General science fiction and fantasy dominated my reading this year-- but it's not so much that I read more of (in 2018/19, I read 47 books in that category) as that I read less of everything else. The Hugos got me back on track reading-wise after a number of very fallow months. As a result, a number of categories do worse in raw numbers than last year but better in percentages.

Here's a graphical sense of how this year compares with previous ones: 

You can compare this to previous years if you're interested: 2007/08, 2008/09, 2009/10, 2011/12, 2012/13, 2014/15, 2015/16, 2016/17, 2017/18, 2018/19. (I didn't do ones for 2010/11 and 2013/14.)

02 September 2020

Review: Library of America Hainish Novels & Stories, Volume One by Ursula K. Le Guin

Hardcover, 1,095 pages
Published 2017 (contents: 1964-95)

Acquired January 2019
Read July 2020
Hainish Novels & Stories, Volume One: Rocannon's World / Planet of Exile / City of Illusions / The Left Hand of Darkness / The Dispossessed / Stories
by Ursula K. Le Guin

This beefy tome collects about half of Ursula Le Guin's so-called "Hainish cycle," less a series and more a setting that she set most, but not all, of her space-based sf in. It's one of two from Library of America, and it collects all of what I would call her "phase one" Hainish stories (1964-67), and about half of her second phase (1969-74), along with one short story from the third phase (1990-2000). Before launching into this (the first of a two-volume set), I had read all six of the Hainish books but none of the short fiction; my original read (back in 2005-07) was in internal chronological order, but I did this one in publication order (more on that in a future post). So I was coming at this material from a slightly different angle than before, with older eyes.

Rocannon's World / Planet of Exile / City of Illusions
These three novels were the first Hainish stories written, but a couple slot in earlier chronologically. That makes me glad I read them in chronological order before, actually, because they are a rough beginning. They're not bad... but they're also nothing special. Together they make up what I see as the first phase of Hainish stories, all action-adventure stories about war. It's Le Guin, so they're deeper than they need to be, but what she would accomplish later is largely nascent here. I've seen some reviewers say each book is better than the one before it, but I disagree: I find Rocannon's World the most interesting. It's a good exploration of something Le Guin was handle a lot in her writing, encounters between different cultures and worldviews. Semley goes from her society to a more advanced one on her own planet, and then to the stars; Rocannon comes from the stars to a "primitive" planet and then treks across it, encountering a number of different societies. There's some beautiful writing, especially in the prologue, where Le Guin cleverly retells an ancient myth in the trappings of sf so well you could be convinced the myth was meant to be about space travel to begin with! Rocannon is a thoughtful protagonist, one of many in the Hainish stories. But I find the end unsatisfying on a number of levels.

Planet of Exile seems to me to be doing something interesting in pairing a war narrative with a more female-focused one, and indeed, its co-lead is the only female protagonist of a Hainish book (there are some in the short fiction) until 1995! But to be honest, I find it boring. Le Guin never really makes one care about the invaders on this distant colony world. City of Illusions starts strong, with a trek across a dangerous landscape combined with a coming of age-- putting those two things together is arguably what she's best at-- but once action moves to the eponymous city, I find everything gets dull fast and there's a little too much psychobabble. I can see why the Shing were quietly written out of the Hainish continuity.

The Left Hand of Darkness
I've always loved The Left Hand of Darkness. (This was my third time.) Reading in publication order, it's even more impressive, though. It's published just two years after City of Illusions, but represents such a massive step up in Le Guin's skill as a writer in general, and a writer of science fiction in particular. Just within the first chapter, you notice a depth of character, a depth of world, and a depth of theme that were absent in the three League of Worlds novels.

Everyone always talks about the gender stuff, something Le Guin herself actually complained about ("the real subject of the book is not feminism or sex or gender or anything of the sort; as far as I can see, it is a book about betrayal and fidelity"), but what always gets me is the relationship between Genly and Estraven. Two people from vastly different world initially unable to comprehend each other who eventually-- I would argue-- fall in love. The climax gets me emotionally every time, utterly heartrending. This is full of acutely observed detail in terms of both character and culture, which would define most of Le Guin's later Hainish work.

The Dispossessed
This was also my third time reading The Dispossessed. I've always liked it, but this was my first time loving it; I think it resonates with me at age 35 in a way it did not at ages 17 and 20. Yes, it's an exploration of anarchist utopia, but it's also an excellent bildungsroman: how do you position yourself in society in a way that's ethical and consistent with your values? This is no less difficult than a utopia, and I found myself moved as I followed each stage of Shevek's journey. The structure is quite clever, too. The image of the wall is very potent.

Stories
There are four pieces of short fiction included in this volume: two sequels to The Left Hand of Darkness ("Winter's King" and "Coming of Age in Karhide"), one prequel to The Dispossessed ("The Day Before the Revolution"), and one other story that I assume is here because all the short fiction in volume two is from the 1990s, and so it would be out of place there ("Vaster Than Empires and More Slow"). I don't think any of these are Le Guin's greatest work, to be honest. "Winter's King" seemed to me to scratch the surface of its theme, one of Le Guin's favorites (the traveller who misses out on years because of NAFAL travel, depicted also in Rocannon's World and volume two's "Another Story"). "Vaster Than Empires and More Slow" was interesting and probably the best of them; its twist is an old theme but I think Le Guin handles it better than most. "The Day Before the Revolution" is a quiet meditative piece that I did really enjoy. "Coming of Age in Karhide" is typically of Le Guin's third-phase Hainish work, and it really belongs in volume two despite its links to The Left Hand of Darkness. It explores an alien biology and culture in a very straightforward coming-of-age story, giving new depth to the Gethenians (and handling their sexual ambiguity better than either Left Hand or "Winter's King" did).

Appendix
Four introduction Le Guin wrote are collected here, alongside a couple other essays and a version of "Winter's King" written before she came up with Gethenian sexuality. The best is "Is Gender Necessary? Redux"; it was an essay originally written in 1976 as a defense of Left Hand, and then rewritten in 1987 to admit she could have done it better after all. The discussion of pronouns is particularly interesting, and strengthens my belief that Ann Leckie was responding to Left Hand when she wrote Ancillary Justice (a novel where people from a gender-ambiguous culture go on a dangerous sledge trip and learn something about each other).

Notes
Overall, I think Brian Attebery's apparatus is good, the notes being minimal and unobtrusive. Two things stuck out at me. One was just amusing: there's a note that explains "Fomalhaut II" means the second planet out from the star Fomalhaut, a thing no sf fan would ever need explained. Clearly a Library of America volume has a very different audience! The other did bother me: volume two end notes "thick description" almost every time Le Guin uses it, explaining the meaning and crediting Geertz. But The Dispossessed frequently uses "mutual aid" and yet Attebery never mentions Kropotkin. (Le Guin mentions him in an essay, but if you didn't already know Kropotkin popularized the term, you wouldn't make the connection.)

* * *

This is a great volume for anyone who thinks they might like Le Guin, or thinks they would. I'll talk more about the Hainish stories overall when I get around to finishing and reviewing volume two.

01 September 2020

Reading Roundup Wrapup: August 2020

Pick of the month: Exhalation by Ted Chiang. A strong collection of short sf, the most consistently enjoyable new read for me in a month of pretty good reads.

All books read:
1. Babylon’s Ashes: Book Six of The Expanse by James S.A. Corey
2. Exhalation by Ted Chiang
3. Hainish Novels & Stories, Volume Two: The Word for World Is Forest / Stories / Five Ways to Forgiveness / The Telling by Ursula K. Le Guin
4. Octopussy & The Living Daylights by Ian Fleming
5. Avatar: The Last Airbender: Team Avatar Tales by Gene Luen Yang et al.
6. Doctor Who: The Infinity Doctors by Lance Parkin
7. Strange Dogs: An Expanse Novella by James S.A. Corey
8. The Relentless Moon by Mary Robinette Kowal
9. The Big Time by Fritz Leiber
10. Tampa Bay Noir edited by Colette Bancroft 

All books acquired:
1. Tampa Bay Noir edited by Colette Bancroft
2. Finding My Elegy: New and Selected Poems, 1960-2010 by Ursula K. Le Guin
3. The Tyrant Baru Cormorant by Seth Dickinson
4. Squaring the Circle: A Pseudotreatise of Urbogony: Fantastic Tales by Gheorghe Săsărman, translated by Ursula K. Le Guin

All books on "To be read" list: 665 (up 2) 

Even though I'm done with the Hugos, I have continued a pretty steady reading pace. Tyrant Baru Cormorant may prove my undoing, however.