Over the next three weeks, I'll be going over my votes in the various categories of Hugo Awards for this year. One of the finalists in Best Dramatic Presentation (Short Form) is an episode of
Star Trek: Discovery, "Magic to Make the Sanest Man Go Mad," which is the first installment of
Star Trek to be a Hugo finalist since 2010. If it won, it would be the first
Star Trek episode to win since 1995.
I'm not sure it has a real chance (can sf fandom's mixed reaction to
Dicovery compete with its love of
Black Mirror?), but it caused me to journey back in time and take a look at how often
Star Trek has competed for and/or won a Hugo Award.
Before Star Trek (1958-66)
First, a little context. Though the Hugo Award for Best Dramatic Presentation (i.e., usually a film or tv episode, though plays and albums and such have been finalists as well) was first awarded in
1958, its early years were pretty rocky. In some years (
1964 and
1966) the category just didn't exist; World Science Fiction Convention organizing committees have the latitude to cancel any category where the nominations are paltry in number. In other years pre-
Star Trek, the category was won by No Award; Hugo voters thought it was better for nothing to win the award in
1963 than for
Night of the Eagle to win it.
In
1965, the last award year before
Star Trek was a Hugo finalist, there were just two finalists, instead of the usual five:
Dr. Strangelove and
7 Faces of Dr. Lao. (
Strangelove won, of course.) I bring all this up to show what minimal options there were for quality sf on screen before
Star Trek arrived on the scene.
The Heyday of the Original Series (1967-71)
Everything changed when, in
1967,
Star Trek was first eligible for the Hugo Award. Even though only fourteen
Star Trek stories were broadcast in 1966, three of them were finalists, which is an excellent success rate. They were "The Naked Time," "The Corbomite Maneuver," and "The Menagerie" (the whole two-parter as one). It's sort of an odd bunch: I don't think anyone now would look back on any of these as classics. The first half of
Star Trek's first season is good, but not great, but had I been a Hugo voter in 1967, I'd've nominated "Balance of Terror," one of
Star Trek's all-time bests. The category was won by "
The Menagerie," also beating out the film adaptations of
Fantastic Voyage and
Fahrenheit 451. I do think that of the three, that's the one I'd go with, and it definitely demonstrates fans' preference for mythology-bending episodes.
The
real dominance of
Star Trek came in
1968, when all five finalists were episodes of
Star Trek: "The City on the Edge of Forever," "Amok Time," "Mirror, Mirror," "The Doomsday Machine," and "The Trouble with Tribbles."* These are all excellent episodes; the second half of season 1 and the first half of season 2 really is one of
Star Trek's best periods. The only quibble I would make is that I think "The Devil in the Dark" deserves to be in there, perhaps instead of "Amok Time." The category was of course won by "
City on the Edge."
In addition, the transcript of the Hugo Awards ceremony for 1968 indicates that Gene Roddenberry was present, and the organizing committee gave him a special plaque inscribed "for producing
Star Trek." So you can see what an effect
Star Trek was having on sf fandom in the 1960s!
Star Trek's domination ended quickly, however. Late season 2 was when the rot set in, and not a single episode of
Star Trek ended up on the ballot for
1969. I would have nominated "A Piece of the Action" (i.e., the gangster one) myself, but then, I'm weird. The finalists that year were
2001: A Space Odyssey,
Charly,
The Prisoner: "Fall Out,"
Rosemary's Baby, and
Yellow Submarine. Of course
2001 won. Hard to argue with that. Nothing was a finalist in
1970, either, the year infamously won by news coverage of the
Apollo 11 landing.
And with
Star Trek gone, the category settled into its previous rut, with No Award beating out all five finalists in
1971, and again in
1977.
†
Star Trek on Film (1980-87)
Unsurprisingly, no episode of the short-lived 1973-74 cartoon was a Hugo finalist. But in 1979,
Star Trek: The Motion Picture premiered in theatres, beginning a consistent run of
Star Trek films making the Hugo ballot that would last until 2010 with two exceptions. However, none of these films ever won.
The Motion Picture lost out to
Alien in
1980, though it
did come in above
The Muppet Movie (which it did not occur to me to categorize as sf) and
The Black Hole (which came in below No Award). This seems justifiable to me.
The Wrath of Khan came in second to
Blade Runner in
1983, which again, seems justifiable. It
did beat
E.T.,
The Dark Crystal, and first
Mad Max film.
The Search for Spock came in third place to
2010: The Year We Make Contact in
1985, which is a goddamn travesty if you ask me.
2010 is a poor film with a couple good parts;
Search for Spock is a decent movie, with a couple excellent parts. (I think its problem is that it climaxes early; stealing the
Enterprise is clearly the best part of the film, meaning everything after that kind of drags.) It wasn't a very good year for sf on film, actually, with the other finalists being
Ghostbusters,
Dune, and
The Last Starfighter. I probably would have voted for
Ghostbusters.
In
1987,
Star Trek again lost to the
Alien franchise, when
The Voyage Home came in second to
Aliens. I would vote for
Voyage Home, personally, but I can see it.
The Heyday of The Next Generation (1988-95)
In 1987,
Star Trek: The Next Generation debuted; in
1988, television
Star Trek returned to the Hugo ballot. Alas, however, the best
TNG could do was "Encounter at Farpoint." Even though it's not very good, I don't think I can disagree that "Farpoint" is the best
TNG episode of 1987; the first season is mostly shit. "Farpoint" came in third, losing to
The Princess Bride. Not exactly inconceivable.
In
1989,
The Final Frontier became the first
Star Trek film to fail to make the ballot. Well, duh. (
Who Framed Roger Rabbit? went on to win.) 1989 is a rare pre-2001 Worldcon from which nominating data still exists. That year, it took at least 58 nominations to make it onto the ballot for Best Dramatic Presentation. The
TNG episode "Elementary, Dear Data" received 15; if
The Final Frontier received any, it was below 12 and therefore the threshold for being listed in the detailed breakdown.
The Land Before Time got more nominations than either!
Things returned to normal in
1992, when
The Undiscovered Country made the ballot. It, however, came in third, losing out to
Terminator 2 and
The Beauty and the Beast. Ouch.
The Next Generation made the ballot again in
1993, when the classic episode "
The Inner Light" not only was a finalist, but won the category, giving
Star Trek its first win in twenty-five years. Nice! The other finalists from that year are pretty dreadful, though (they include
Batman Returns and
Alien 3), so there you go. (Did you know? I've actually
never seen "Inner Light"! But people say it's a good one.)
And then in
1995,
Star Trek had multiple finalists for the first time since 1968, when both the
TNG series finale, "All Good Things...", and the first
TNG film,
Generations, made the ballot. "
All Good Things" won, garnering
Star Trek its fourth win-- and, not to give the game away, final win to date. Another deserved victory; I'd definitely give it to "All Good Things" over
The Mask or
Stargate.
Always the Tawi'Yan, Never the Groom (1996-2002)
After that,
Star Trek continued to rack up finalist positions for a little while. In
1996, "The Visitor" was the first episode of
Deep Space Nine to make the ballot, though it lost to an episode of
Babylon 5.
In
1997,
Star Trek once again garnered a double ballot appearance, with
First Contact and
Deep Space Nine: "Trials and Tribble-ations." They came in second and third, respectively, but were beat out by another episode of
Bablyon 5. And, in fact, they could not have both made the ballot if J. Michael Straczynski had not declined nomination for three other episodes of
Babylon 5 that met the nomination threshold that year!
As a side note, a Hugo Award actually appeared
on the show in 1998. In the 1953-set
DS9 episode "Far Beyond the Stars," the one of the episode's various sf writer characters walks by carrying a Hugo Award in his hands:
Memory Alpha indicates the award wasn't actually one of the ones won by
Star Trek. It was one of two won by production illustrator Rick Sternbach, back in 1977 and 1978, for Best Professional Artist. Given the first Hugo Awards were given
in 1953, the character must have won that very year. The appearance of the award itself is anachronistic; the award's appearance fluctuated throughout its first few decades, and in 1953 it actually looked like
this, not as sleek as the design that was eventually adopted.
Somewhat bafflingly,
Insurrection made the ballot in
1999, maybe just out of sheer inertia. It came in last, losing to
The Truman Show,
Dark City,
Pleasantville, and another damn
Babylon 5 episode. I'd definitely give it to
Truman Show too.
Star Trek: Voyager went off the air in 2001. It is the only live-action
Star Trek series to never be a Hugo finalist.
The Split (2003-06)
Contrary to the situation in the 1960s, by the 2000s, we were flooded with quality sf on screen. With that in mind, in
2003, Worldcon split the Best Dramatic Presentation award into two separate categories, "long form" and "short form." The cut-off is ninety minutes, which lets two-part episodes be nominated as one under short form, but places films and entire seasons of television programs under long form.
Perhaps because of this,
Star Trek completely unjustifiably made the ballot in 2003, with
two episodes of
Enterprise, "Carbon Creek" and "A Night in Sickbay." "Carbon Creek" is decent, if not award-worthy, but "Night in Sickbay" is dreadful, one of the worst hours of
Star Trek ever produced. They came in third and fifth respectively, the
Buffy the Vampire Slayer episode "Conversations with Dead People" deservedly winning.
Star Trek was also eligible in long form that year, but
Nemesis failed to make the ballot by a wide margin; the minimum required was 130 nominations, and
Nemesis received only 43. It did, however, get more nominations than
Signs or
Solaris, both of which are much better films. (
The Two Towers won.)
Enterprise never made the ballot again, which is a shame, because the show actually got good at that point. (Notoriously,
2004 was the year the short form category was won by
a three-minute clip of Andy Serkis and Gollum accepting the MTV Movie Award for Best Animated Performance. But if you look at the other four finalists from that year, it actually is the best thing on the ballot. I probably would have voted for No Award.)
State of Decay (2006-17)
Once
Enterprise went off the air in 2005, there was no
Star Trek eligible to be a Hugo finalist until J. J. Abrams's 2009
Star Trek film.
Or was there? Controversially, in
2008, a
Star Trek fanfilm made the final ballot. The episode "World Enough and Time" of
New Voyages garnered 48 nominations. I haven't seen it, I'm told it really is good, but every episode of
New Voyages (later rebranded
Phase II) I
have seen has been execrable. That's more nominations than episodes of
Battlestar Galactica,
Torchwood,
Pushing Daisies,
Lost, and
Stargate SG-1. I seem to recall a lot of people being mad about this, thinking it not right that a fanfilm should be Hugo finalist, but upon doing some Googling, maybe I'm confusing it with the fact that "World Enough and Time" was also a Nebula finalist. Unlike the Hugos, the Nebula rules specify finalists must be professionally produced, and that's clearly untrue of a fan film.
In any case, "World Enough and Time" came in last.
Doctor Who: "Blink" was on the ballot that year, so there really was no question what would win.
In
2010, Abrams's
Star Trek was the last
Star Trek film to land on the Hugo ballot. It came in fourth, losing to
Moon,
District 9, and
Up, but beating
Avatar. That seems entirely reasonable.
That was it for
Star Trek until this year.
Star Trek Into Darkness didn't make the ballot in
2014 (138 nominations were required; it got 88), and neither did
Star Trek Beyond in
2017 (240 nominations required; it received 113). That latter is a shame, at least; I'd've ranked
Beyond above some of the actual finalists, like the
Ghostbusters reboot,
Deadpool, and
Rogue One.
The Future (2018-??)
Like I said, I don't expect
Discovery to win
this year, even though I ranked it first myself. I'm pretty sure it will be
Black Mirror's "USS
Callister." I don't know if a hypothetical fourth reboot film will get back on the ballot, either.
In some ways, though,
Star Trek is a victim of its own success. Before
Star Trek, there was often not enough sf on screen to even merit giving an award for it. Since
Star Trek (and, admittedly,
Star Wars), we've been flooded with sf on screen. Mediocre
Star Trek films used to make the ballot regularly; now even good ones can't push their way in. It's a good problem to have as an sf fan, but a sad one as
Star Trek fan.
* This couldn't happen these days. In part as a reaction to the dominance of Doctor Who (which claimed three of five finalist slots in 2006, 2007, 2008, 2010, 2011, 2012, and 2013), in 2017 a new rule went into effect: "No author, or group of authors, or dramatic presentation series, can have more than two finalists in any one category."
† 1977 would be the last time any Hugo category was won by No Award until 2015 (when No Award was used to counter the effects of slating). According to Kevin Standlee, "There has been speculation that Star Wars [A New Hope], which had just premiered and would go on to win the 1978 Hugo Award, had had such an effect upon the voters that they rejected all of the 1977 Hugo Award finalists by comparison, even though Star Wars was not eligible for the 1977 Awards."
